2006
DOI: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2006.04.195
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Vascular dynamics and BOLD fMRI: CBF level effects and analysis considerations

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

2
37
0
5

Year Published

2008
2008
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
7
1
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 54 publications
(44 citation statements)
references
References 35 publications
2
37
0
5
Order By: Relevance
“…The relatively small number of subjects assessed in this initial study calls for caution in the interpretation of the present between-group null effect, since such an effect could be due to insufficient statistical power, though we note that the comparison studies referenced above (some showing positive between-group effects) comprised subject samples of similar size. Alternatively, the lack of group differences reported here could be an artifact of elevated baseline amygdala blood flow in GAD consistent with findings that baseline blood flow correlates negatively with the magnitude of evoked blood oxygenation level-dependent (BOLD) responses (46). This possibility could be explicitly tested using positron-emission tomography (PET) imaging or perfusion imaging in future fMRI studies.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 67%
“…The relatively small number of subjects assessed in this initial study calls for caution in the interpretation of the present between-group null effect, since such an effect could be due to insufficient statistical power, though we note that the comparison studies referenced above (some showing positive between-group effects) comprised subject samples of similar size. Alternatively, the lack of group differences reported here could be an artifact of elevated baseline amygdala blood flow in GAD consistent with findings that baseline blood flow correlates negatively with the magnitude of evoked blood oxygenation level-dependent (BOLD) responses (46). This possibility could be explicitly tested using positron-emission tomography (PET) imaging or perfusion imaging in future fMRI studies.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 67%
“…The BOLD signal reflects changes in CBF relative to changes in cerebral metabolic rate of oxygen (CMRO 2 ) (Buxton et al, 2004). By implementing a vascular model of the hemodynamic response, Vazquez et al (2006) have suggested that changes in baseline CBF might influence latency and amplitude parameters of the BOLD signal. Concerning development, global cortical CBF was shown to increase during early childhood, peaking at about age 5 to 6, and then to decline, reaching an adult level in late adolescence (Chiron et al, 1992;Takahashi et al, 1999).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Thus, stimulation of the central region could have had a reduced impact to the BOLD signal, thus producing apparent suppression (see Methods). Increased baseline rCBF is also known to reduce stimulus-induced BOLD activation [Stefanovic et al, 2006;Vazquez et al, 2006]. We probed the possible contribution of these nonlinearities by varying the stimulus contrast.…”
Section: Figurementioning
confidence: 99%