2002
DOI: 10.1038/sj.bjc.6600053
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Vascular density and phenotype around ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS) of the breast

Abstract: Up to 50% of recurrences of ductal carcinoma in situ of the breast are associated with invasive carcinoma but no pathological or molecular features have yet been found to predict for the development of invasive disease. For a tumour to invade, it requires the formation of new blood vessels. Previous studies have described a vascular rim around ducts involved by ductal carcinoma in situ, raising the possibility that the characteristics of periductal vascularisation may be important in determining transformation… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

4
27
1

Year Published

2003
2003
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 36 publications
(32 citation statements)
references
References 30 publications
(30 reference statements)
4
27
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Several explanations are feasible for this rather unexpected finding: Our data, demonstrating quantitative differences between expression of angiogenic factors, suggest a biological difference among the groups of (a) pure DCIS and (b) DCIS with concomitant invasive carcinoma. This is consistent with findings from Teo et al (2002) describing a different vascular density and phenotype in pure DCIS vs DCIS associated with invasive carcinoma, the latter showing significantly greater numbers of CD34 þ and CD141 þ vessels and fewer staining for FVIII (Teo et al, 2002). Besides distinct vascular profiles in pure and coexistent DCIS, that study also showed a significant negative correlation between vascular density and the extent of necrosis of the tumour, and a correlation between vascular density and the nuclear grade was noted, being highest in the intermediate grade DCIS (Teo et al, 2002).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 83%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Several explanations are feasible for this rather unexpected finding: Our data, demonstrating quantitative differences between expression of angiogenic factors, suggest a biological difference among the groups of (a) pure DCIS and (b) DCIS with concomitant invasive carcinoma. This is consistent with findings from Teo et al (2002) describing a different vascular density and phenotype in pure DCIS vs DCIS associated with invasive carcinoma, the latter showing significantly greater numbers of CD34 þ and CD141 þ vessels and fewer staining for FVIII (Teo et al, 2002). Besides distinct vascular profiles in pure and coexistent DCIS, that study also showed a significant negative correlation between vascular density and the extent of necrosis of the tumour, and a correlation between vascular density and the nuclear grade was noted, being highest in the intermediate grade DCIS (Teo et al, 2002).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 83%
“…This is consistent with findings from Teo et al (2002) describing a different vascular density and phenotype in pure DCIS vs DCIS associated with invasive carcinoma, the latter showing significantly greater numbers of CD34 þ and CD141 þ vessels and fewer staining for FVIII (Teo et al, 2002). Besides distinct vascular profiles in pure and coexistent DCIS, that study also showed a significant negative correlation between vascular density and the extent of necrosis of the tumour, and a correlation between vascular density and the nuclear grade was noted, being highest in the intermediate grade DCIS (Teo et al, 2002). The latter is also in agreement with our observation that the association of the proangiogenic growth factors and receptors with pure DCIS was considerably more pronounced in the subgroup of non-high-grade DCIS as compared with high-grade DCIS.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 83%
“…Vascular breaks were classified as demonstrating type "A" vascular breaks (blood vessel growing into but not completely through a duct), type "B" vascular breaks (blood vessel completely transecting a duct into unequal parts), or both. Stromal microvessel density was calculated on 5 randomly selected low-grade DCIS cases and 5 randomly selected high-grade cases with criteria adapted from Teo et al [11] (see Fig. 2 for examples of types of vascular patterns).…”
Section: Classification Of Casesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, there are conflicting data regarding the difference in angiogenesis in low-, intermediate-, and highgrade DCIS. Some studies demonstrated significant differences in vascular density and expression of regulators of angiogenesis among different grades of DCIS [8][9][10][11], whereas others were unable to demonstrate a significant difference using similar approaches [7].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This value is greater than the 1%-5% vascular volume fractions observed in vivo for many tissues. [25][26][27] Thus, whether optimal designs based on a parallel array of vessels are appropriate for an engineered tissue will depend on how the magnitude of the vascular fraction affects the design objective. For instance, having a large fraction of a tissue consist of open vessels may compromise the mechanical stability of the tissue.…”
Section: B Implications For Vascular Designmentioning
confidence: 99%