Our system is currently under heavy load due to increased usage. We're actively working on upgrades to improve performance. Thank you for your patience.
2018
DOI: 10.1111/ejn.13941
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Varying the rate of intravenous cocaine infusion influences the temporal dynamics of both drug and dopamine concentrations in the striatum

Abstract: The faster drugs of abuse reach the brain, the greater is the risk of addiction. Even small differences in the rate of drug delivery can influence outcome. Infusing cocaine intravenously over 5 vs. 90-100 s promotes sensitization to the psychomotor and incentive motivational effects of the drug and preferentially recruits mesocorticolimbic regions. It remains unclear whether these effects are due to differences in how fast and/or how much drug reaches the brain. Here, we predicted that varying the rate of intr… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
12
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6
3
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 19 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 60 publications
(116 reference statements)
0
12
0
Order By: Relevance
“…For instance, in a previous study, we reduced the duration of intravenous cocaine infusion from 4 s (which is the duration of infusion used in our drug choice studies, including the present study) to 1 s, but this had no observable impact on drug choice outcomes (unpublished findings). This negative finding was not unexpected, however, since the duration of infusion should have little effect on the time course of drug concentration in the body and the brain, and thus on the delay to cocaine reward, except, of course, when the infusion duration is excessively long [28,64]. Thus, it is not possible to offer rats a drug reward with either a known delay or no delay at all, a limitation that considerably restricts our ability to compare drug rewards with nondrug rewards.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 93%
“…For instance, in a previous study, we reduced the duration of intravenous cocaine infusion from 4 s (which is the duration of infusion used in our drug choice studies, including the present study) to 1 s, but this had no observable impact on drug choice outcomes (unpublished findings). This negative finding was not unexpected, however, since the duration of infusion should have little effect on the time course of drug concentration in the body and the brain, and thus on the delay to cocaine reward, except, of course, when the infusion duration is excessively long [28,64]. Thus, it is not possible to offer rats a drug reward with either a known delay or no delay at all, a limitation that considerably restricts our ability to compare drug rewards with nondrug rewards.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 93%
“…These effects are likely mediated by differences in the temporal kinetics with which cocaine reaches its sites of action in the brain, rather than by differences in achieved dose. Indeed, varying infusion duration between 5 and 100 s produces differences in the rate of rise of cocaine concentrations in the brain, without producing large effects on peak concentrations [8,9,14].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This may again be attributed to the underestimation of baseline in microdialysis, as well as the possibility that cocaine-induced increases in synaptic dopamine may be affected by factors related to the physical presence of the microdialysis probe, such as the formation of a layer of traumatized tissue ( Di Chiara et al, 1993 ; Blaha et al, 1996 ). The rate and dose of drug administration may also have an impact ( Minogianis et al, 2019 ). As mentioned in the Methods section, the rate was controlled at 5-min duration to avoid overdosing.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%