2004
DOI: 10.1093/bioinformatics/bti023
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

VarMixt: efficient variance modelling for the differential analysis of replicated gene expression data

Abstract: http://www.inapg.inra.fr/ens_rech/mathinfo/recherche/mathematique/outil.html.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
82
0

Year Published

2005
2005
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 80 publications
(84 citation statements)
references
References 12 publications
2
82
0
Order By: Relevance
“…1A and B). Using a novel statistical method for the differential analysis of gene expression (16) and cluster analysis, we defined six mutually exclusive groups of genes (Supplementary Fig. 1; Supplementary Table 2).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…1A and B). Using a novel statistical method for the differential analysis of gene expression (16) and cluster analysis, we defined six mutually exclusive groups of genes (Supplementary Fig. 1; Supplementary Table 2).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Between 30,313 and 31,453 spots were recovered from each array slide. To assess differentially expressed genes, we used the Varmixt method that allows a control of the heterogeneity of variance (16).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…html). Differential analysis was carried out separately for each comparison between two cell samples, using the VM method [VarMixt package (Delmar et al, 2005)], together with the Benjamini and Yekutieli (Reiner et al, 2003) P-value adjustment method. Only genes with significant (P,0.05) fold changes in expression were taken into consideration.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…An estimation of the variance for each protein observation was performed using the mixed model of Delmar et al (2005aDelmar et al ( , 2005b implemented in the anapuce R package and consisting in the estimation of several groups of proteins with the same variance. Finally, a classical FDR procedure was applied to correct for multiple comparison tests according to the procedure of Benjamini and Hachberg (1995) implemented in the anapuce R package.…”
Section: Normalization and Differential Abundance Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%