2003
DOI: 10.1501/sbfder_0000001634
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Varlık Vergisi Konusundaki Yolsuzluk Söylentileri

Abstract: Corruption Rumors about the Capital Tax (Varlık Vergisi) AbstractDuring World War II, shoıtages in ıhe basie cansumpıion goods and production inputs, incre;ısing prices and falling production c:t\Ised black markeıing. Dııe lo the war econoıny and speculative atmosphere a considerable wc.~lıIı accumulated in the hands of the commercial and agricuIıural bourgcoisie. InSlıfticienl GovenlienI revemıes. inercasing inlernaıioııal and economic pressııres fare ed tlıe government to utilize new tinaııcia! iııstnımenıs.… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 0 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Besides, there is no research dealing with the identity depictions of Turkey and Europe during the Second World War. The existing literature on the Second World War is either composed of sources with a general perspective on Turkish foreign policy ( Deringil, 1989 ; Oran, 2001 ) or works particularly focusing on the Capital levy ( Aktar, 1996 ; Aktar, 2000 ; Coşar, 2003 ; İnci, 2012 ). Moreover, most works dwelling on the Republican period rather examine Turkey’s top-down Westernization process without offering a detailed analysis on how Europe was perceived in the Republican Turkey and how the Republican transformation was received by European society ( Heper, 2004 ; Keyder, 1993 ; Keyman, 2006 ; Nas, 2001 ; Polat, 2006 ).…”
Section: The Second Period (1923–1945)mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Besides, there is no research dealing with the identity depictions of Turkey and Europe during the Second World War. The existing literature on the Second World War is either composed of sources with a general perspective on Turkish foreign policy ( Deringil, 1989 ; Oran, 2001 ) or works particularly focusing on the Capital levy ( Aktar, 1996 ; Aktar, 2000 ; Coşar, 2003 ; İnci, 2012 ). Moreover, most works dwelling on the Republican period rather examine Turkey’s top-down Westernization process without offering a detailed analysis on how Europe was perceived in the Republican Turkey and how the Republican transformation was received by European society ( Heper, 2004 ; Keyder, 1993 ; Keyman, 2006 ; Nas, 2001 ; Polat, 2006 ).…”
Section: The Second Period (1923–1945)mentioning
confidence: 99%