1996
DOI: 10.1007/978-1-4612-2392-4
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Variowin

Abstract: except for brief excerpts in connection with reviews or scholarly analysis. Use in connection with any form of information sto rage and retrieval, electronic adaptation, computer software, or by similar or dissimilar methodology now known or hereafter developed is forbidden. The use of general descriptive names, trade names, trademarks, etc., in this pUblication, even if th e former are not especially identified, is not to be taken as a sign Ihat such names, as understood by the Trade Marks and Merchandise Mar… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0
1

Year Published

2005
2005
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 210 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
5
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…was fitted, with C 0 the nugget variance, C 0 + C 1 the sill and a the range of spatial autocorrelation. The best fit was obtained with the ‘Indicator Goodness of Fit’ parameter of Variowin (Pannatier, 1996) as a guide. The model parameters are given in Table 2, and both variograms are plotted in Figure 5.…”
Section: Geostatistical Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…was fitted, with C 0 the nugget variance, C 0 + C 1 the sill and a the range of spatial autocorrelation. The best fit was obtained with the ‘Indicator Goodness of Fit’ parameter of Variowin (Pannatier, 1996) as a guide. The model parameters are given in Table 2, and both variograms are plotted in Figure 5.…”
Section: Geostatistical Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…All measured soil physical and chemical properties were checked for normality. Using Variowin (Pannatier, 1996) and ArcGIS geostatistical Analyst (ESRI, 2004), variograms of each soil physical property and cross-variograms were obtained. The spherical models were fitted to the variograms (Fig 2):…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To determine the length, width and unitary surface area of the pruning residues, we used image j . We used variowin 2·21 (Pannatier, ) for variogram analysis and geoMS (Centre for Natural Resources and the Environment, ) for stochastic simulation. Finally, to visualize the maps and execute general operations, Arcgis 10·1 (Environmental Systems Research Institute, ) was employed.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%