2015
DOI: 10.1175/mwr-d-14-00269.1
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Variogram-Based Proper Scoring Rules for Probabilistic Forecasts of Multivariate Quantities*

Abstract: Proper scoring rules provide a theoretically principled framework for the quantitative assessment of the predictive performance of probabilistic forecasts. While a wide selection of such scoring rules for univariate quantities exists, there are only few scoring rules for multivariate quantities, and many of them require that forecasts are given in the form of a probability density function. The energy score, a multivariate generalization of the continuous ranked probability score, is the only commonly used sco… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

9
195
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 153 publications
(207 citation statements)
references
References 40 publications
9
195
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In a more general context of a full ensemble system of snowpack modelling with various applications, the selection of members might be improved by defining multiobjective probabilistic criteria combining several evaluation variables or even several evaluation sites. Recent investigations on that topic for the purpose of ensemble meteorological forecasting proposed generalisations of the classical univariate probabilistic tools (Gneiting et al, 2008;Scheuerer and Hamill, 2015;Thorarinsdottir et al, 2016) which could be tested in ensemble snow modelling. Special care should be taken in the future to deal with the covariance of errors among the different evaluation variables.…”
Section: Limitations Of Scores and Selection Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In a more general context of a full ensemble system of snowpack modelling with various applications, the selection of members might be improved by defining multiobjective probabilistic criteria combining several evaluation variables or even several evaluation sites. Recent investigations on that topic for the purpose of ensemble meteorological forecasting proposed generalisations of the classical univariate probabilistic tools (Gneiting et al, 2008;Scheuerer and Hamill, 2015;Thorarinsdottir et al, 2016) which could be tested in ensemble snow modelling. Special care should be taken in the future to deal with the covariance of errors among the different evaluation variables.…”
Section: Limitations Of Scores and Selection Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The energy score reduces to the Euclidean error ‖bold-italicΌ−bold-italicyobs‖ for a deterministic point mass forecasts at ÎŒ and can be reported in the same unit as the observations. It has been noted that the ES discriminates well between forecasts with different means or variances, but less so for forecasts with different correlation structures.…”
Section: Predictive Model Assessmentmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Its analogue for multivariate quantities is the energy score (ES: Gneiting et al , ), which in the case of an ensemble forecast is computed via alignleftalign-1align-2ES(x1,
,xN;y)align-1align-2=1N∑n=1N||xn−y||−12N2∑Μ=1N∑n=1N||xΜ−xn||, where ||·|| denotes the Euclidean norm. While the ES is suitable to emphasize the benefits of postprocessing itself, it might fail to detect mis‐specifications in the correlation structures (Pinson and Tastu, ; Scheuerer and Hamill, ). In contrast, the variogram score (VS: Scheuerer and Hamill, ) is more sensitive in this respect.…”
Section: Case Studymentioning
confidence: 99%