A negative extended-spectrum -lactamase (ESBL) confirmation test result obtained after a positive ESBL screening test result using Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute methods has been a common occurrence among isolates of Escherichia coli and Klebsiella pneumoniae in the SENTRY Antimicrobial Surveillance Program in the Asia-Pacific region. Among isolates collected between 1998 and 2004 this screen-positive, nonconfirmed profile (failed to show clavulanate synergy) was observed in 8.9% of 4,515 E. coli isolates and 20.3% of 2,303 K. pneumoniae isolates. We then selected 52 E. coli isolates and 68 K. pneumoniae isolates with a negative ESBL confirmation test, as well as comparable number of isolates with confirmed ESBL-positive tests, and examined them for the presence of TEM, SHV, plasmid-borne ampC, and CTX-M genes. We found that 62% of nonconfirming E. coli isolates and 75% of nonconfirming K. pneumoniae harbored a plasmid-borne AmpC enzyme of the CIT or DHA type. The majority of nonconfirming E. coli and K. pneumoniae from the Asia-Pacific region harbor important -lactamases, and a positive screening test alone should be sufficient grounds to report resistance to extended-spectrum cephalosporins in this region.
Current Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute (CLSI)standards recommend the use of a screening and confirmation test, in addition to standard susceptibility testing methods, to detect extended-spectrum -lactamases (ESBLs) in the routine clinical laboratory among strains of Escherichia coli and Klebsiella pneumoniae (1,6). This method has proven reliable over many years at detecting the great majority of conventional ESBLs, particularly of variants of the TEM and SHV enzyme classes. The CLSI method, however, does not address the significance of strains that are positive on the screening test but negative on the confirmation test. By default, the result of the standard susceptibility test (e.g., broth microdilution or disk diffusion) is applied to organisms with this ESBL test profile. However, the MIC distributions for these wild-type gram-negative species suggest that strains for which the MICs of any of the ESBL screening agents are Ͼ1 g/ml are abnormal (8) and therefore likely to possess an acquired resistance mechanism. In particular, the emergence of plasmid-borne AmpC -lactamases, which are not inhibited by clavulanic acid, in members of the Enterobacteriaceae (13) is likely to explain at least some of the strains that have a positive screening test but a negative confirmation test. It is important for both clinical and infection control reasons to detect strains harboring transmissible resistance mechanisms to extended-spectrum cephalosporins.The present study examined isolates for which the MICs of extended-spectrum cephalosporins and/or aztreonam are Ͼ1 g/ml, including strains that would be considered susceptible by routine susceptibility testing using CLSI broth microdilution. In particular, we focused on their overall frequency in a prospective collection of clinical isolates...