2015
DOI: 10.1007/s11049-015-9291-y
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Varieties of intensification

Abstract: This paper is a commentary on Beltrama and Bochnak (2015), who propose a uniform semantics for different uses of cross-categorial intensifiers -issimo in Italian and šému in Washo as universal quantifiers over contexts. Two concerns of their uniform semantics are raised, (i) unexpected restrictions on intensification, and (ii) non-truth-conditional intensification. It is argued that a uniform semantics like Beltrama and Bochnak's is unachievable, and suggested that the multitude of uses commonly observed with … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 13 publications
(12 reference statements)
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The meaning of some expressions are dependent upon choosing a perspective for a truth value. Following Bylinina, McCready & Sudo (2015), we call words and phrases that trigger this dependence perspective-sensitive items (henceforth PSIs). Under their definition, PSIs are lexical items whose meaning is dependent on a perspective center (a.k.a.…”
Section: The Semantics Of Perspectivementioning
confidence: 99%
“…The meaning of some expressions are dependent upon choosing a perspective for a truth value. Following Bylinina, McCready & Sudo (2015), we call words and phrases that trigger this dependence perspective-sensitive items (henceforth PSIs). Under their definition, PSIs are lexical items whose meaning is dependent on a perspective center (a.k.a.…”
Section: The Semantics Of Perspectivementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Despite some description of this occurrence (e.g. Beltrama & Bochnak, 2015;Bylinina & Sudo, 2015), this paper focus on a gap in the literature on scalar semantics: the use of very with NPs. Therefore, the importance of this study is in its attempt to expand the use of scalar semantics to degree modification of NPs proposing a unified analysis for very in both uses, canonical and non-canonical.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%