2021
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-030-77692-3_3
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Variations of Stable Isotope Ratios in Nature

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 1,257 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…By substituting actual clumped isotope temperatures (T[Δ 47 ]) for an assumed environmental temperature (cf., Section 5.3.2), we can calculate source water (δ 18 O sw ) values for these spar‐formation fluids, which range from −2.1 to −5.2‰ (VSMOW). These values are significantly enriched in 18 O relative to estimated environmental/meteoric waters for the region during the Paleogene (e.g., Jahren & Sternberg, 2008; Tripati et al., 2001), suggesting source fluids for spar components were either dominantly metamorphic (e.g., Hoefs, 2021) or were hydrothermal fluids undergoing significant water‐rock interactions in the subsurface (see above; see also Ferry & Gerdes, 1998; Taylor & Epstein, 1962). Localized impacts of hydrothermal fluids in these sediments are unsurprising, given the regional gradient in deformation across the basin (e.g., Figure 1b; Embry & Beauchamp, 2008).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 95%
“…By substituting actual clumped isotope temperatures (T[Δ 47 ]) for an assumed environmental temperature (cf., Section 5.3.2), we can calculate source water (δ 18 O sw ) values for these spar‐formation fluids, which range from −2.1 to −5.2‰ (VSMOW). These values are significantly enriched in 18 O relative to estimated environmental/meteoric waters for the region during the Paleogene (e.g., Jahren & Sternberg, 2008; Tripati et al., 2001), suggesting source fluids for spar components were either dominantly metamorphic (e.g., Hoefs, 2021) or were hydrothermal fluids undergoing significant water‐rock interactions in the subsurface (see above; see also Ferry & Gerdes, 1998; Taylor & Epstein, 1962). Localized impacts of hydrothermal fluids in these sediments are unsurprising, given the regional gradient in deformation across the basin (e.g., Figure 1b; Embry & Beauchamp, 2008).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 95%