1987
DOI: 10.3769/radioisotopes.36.2_74
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Variations of natural 15N abundances in the tissues and digesta of domestic animals.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

10
69
2
2

Year Published

1999
1999
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 106 publications
(83 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
10
69
2
2
Order By: Relevance
“…In the present study, rumen bacteria were 15 N enriched relative to diets (average of 0.93‰) in agreement with in vivo studies (Sutoh et al, 1987 (average of 2.17‰) ; Sutoh et al, 1993 (average of 3.29‰)), but not with in vitro assays (Wattiaux and Reed, 1995 (rumen bacteria depleted in 15 N relative to substrates)). Isotopic N fractionation in bacteria may occur during assimilation, synthesis, transfer and excretion of N compounds (Macko et al, 1987).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 90%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…In the present study, rumen bacteria were 15 N enriched relative to diets (average of 0.93‰) in agreement with in vivo studies (Sutoh et al, 1987 (average of 2.17‰) ; Sutoh et al, 1993 (average of 3.29‰)), but not with in vitro assays (Wattiaux and Reed, 1995 (rumen bacteria depleted in 15 N relative to substrates)). Isotopic N fractionation in bacteria may occur during assimilation, synthesis, transfer and excretion of N compounds (Macko et al, 1987).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 90%
“…Finally, it is important to note that the sample extracted in SAB is considered as representing the total attached microbial population (Martin et al, 1994), and not exclusively composed of bacteria. As rumen protozoa show higher δ 15 N values than rumen bacteria (Sutoh et al, 1987), compatible with a classical diet eater isotopic relation (trophic shift), an increase in δ 15 N of SAB may arise from a small contribution of protozoa to this fraction.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 58%
See 3 more Smart Citations