Variations of emotional display rules within and across cultures: A comparison between Canada, USA, and Japan.

Abstract

This study investigates emotional display rules for seven basic emotions. The main goal was to compare emotional display rules of Canadians, US Americans, and Japanese across as well as within cultures regarding the specific emotion, the type of interaction partner, and gender. A total of 835 university students participated in the study. The results indicate that Japanese display rules permit the expression of powerful (anger, contempt, and disgust) significantly less than those of the two North American samples. Japanese also think that they should express positive emotions (happiness, surprise) significantly less than the Canadian sample. Furthermore, Japanese varied the display rules for different interaction partners more than the two North American samples did only for powerful emotions. Gender differences were similar across all three cultural groups. Men expressed powerful emotions more than women and women expressed powerless emotions (sadness, fear) and happiness more than men. Depending on the type of emotion and interaction partner some shared display rules occurred across culture and gender. The implications of these findings are discussed in relation to cultural dimensions and other cultural characteristics.

Stress, coping, coping effectiveness and emotions in Malaysian Elite tenpin bowlers: Role of context and importance

“…Our finding supports the idea that positive and negative emotions are independent yet can co-exist in the sport context . In addition, it provides support for the notion that East Asians experience mixed emotions (Miyamoto et al, 2010) and are more likely to engage in dialectical thinking, believing that positive and negative feelings can be experienced concurrently (Safdar et al, 2009).…”

“…While the physiological response associated with emotions appears to be invariant, the behavioural expression (facial in particular) varies across cultures (Tsai, Levenson, & Carstensen, 2000). East Asians, for example, are more likely to engage in dialectical thinking believing that positive and negative feelings co-exist (Safdar et al, 2009). Miyamoto, Uchida, and Ellsworth (2010) found that for a positive event (e.g.…”

Diversity from within: The Impact of Cultural Variables on Emotion Expressivity in Singapore

“…In general, individualistic cultures promote primacy of individual needs, and individuals are encouraged to be authentic and open with their expression (Butler et al, 2007). Collectivist cultures value emotion suppression (Matsumoto et al, 2008), generally have more rules for expression management, and are more sensitive to others around them when expressing emotion, especially negative emotions (Butler et al, 2007;Safdar et al, 2009;Wei et al, 2013). Thus, extended to expression of positive and negative emotions we predict:…”

Can you trust a customer's expression? Insights into nonverbal communication in the retail context

“…Each culture has specific rules, called display rules, which dictate what is appropriate to express (Diefendorff & Greguras, 2009;Fok et al, 2008;Saarni, 1979;Safdar et al, 2009). These rules consist of two subsets: normative masking and emotion dialects.…”

“…As a result of socialization, certain normative masking display rules are reinforced, which in turn shapes each person's view of the appropriateness of certain nonverbal behaviors (Brody & Fischer, 2000;Malatesta & Haviland, 1982;Mesquita, 2010). For example, Japanese display rules more strictly limit display of powerful emotions (anger, disgust, and contempt) than those in U.S. or Canadian cultures (Safdar et al, 2009). Although display rules in Eastern cultures tend to encourage masking true feelings, they also support the expression of politeness and social status deference through nonverbal behavior, which implies they may be more expressive in some contexts (Ambady et al, 1996).…”