1967
DOI: 10.1029/jz072i021p05331
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Variations in total electron content and other ionospheric parameters associated with magnetic storms

Abstract: The storm‐time variations of the ionosphere in middle latitudes during ionospheric storms are described. Usually the total electron content is increased during the first 24 hours of the storm. The total content then falls to below its quiet‐day value and recovers after one or two days. The peak electron concentration in the F region is similarly increased at the beginning of the storm and is later depressed. The fall in peak electron concentration commences some hours earlier than the fall in total electron co… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
13
0

Year Published

1968
1968
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 45 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 23 publications
1
13
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Thus, percent-change time sequences are simply averaged to form <D st (τ , %)> i , where τ is at hourly intervals from the UT of the SC, and i represents sample size, e.g., the number of storms in winter months, or the number of storms during solar minimum years, etc. This type of analysis was first introduced for the study of geomagnetic storms, and then popularized for use with ionospheric storms by Matsushita (1959) with ionosonde data, and later for TEC data by Hibberd and Ross (1967) and Mendillo (1971).…”
Section: Formation Of Statistical Patternsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Thus, percent-change time sequences are simply averaged to form <D st (τ , %)> i , where τ is at hourly intervals from the UT of the SC, and i represents sample size, e.g., the number of storms in winter months, or the number of storms during solar minimum years, etc. This type of analysis was first introduced for the study of geomagnetic storms, and then popularized for use with ionospheric storms by Matsushita (1959) with ionosonde data, and later for TEC data by Hibberd and Ross (1967) and Mendillo (1971).…”
Section: Formation Of Statistical Patternsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…1, the solar flux parameter F10.7 portrays the typical pattern of a steeper rise than decline in solar activity. We have divided this cycle into four phases: Minimum (onset in October 1964through 1965, plus 1975through June 1976, Rising (1966 and1967), Maximum (1968Maximum ( through 1970 and Declining (1971Declining ( through 1974. Geomagnetic activity, as represented by the daily index A p , does not following this pattern closely, leading to the discovery that coronal holes are the dominant cause of geomagnetic activity during the declining phases.…”
Section: Effects During Different Phases Of the Solar Cyclementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Examples on the Feb. 11, 1958 storm given by Matuura (1963) are illustrated in Figure 5. Decreases in Nr on one or two days after sudden commencement have been observed by Taylor (1961), Nakata (1966), Hibberd and Ross (1967), Titheridge andAndrews (1967), Mendillo et al (1969) and Taylor and Earnshaw (1969). The vertical structure of the F-region at Kokubunji during the sharp decrease on Feb. 11, 1958 is shown in Figure 6.…”
Section: Hours After Start Of Stormmentioning
confidence: 74%
“…Recent works by Pirog et al [2006] and Romanova et al [2006] found that, both in winter and summer seasons, the ionospheric disturbances are positive at low latitudes in the daytime. A positive response is also typical for lower levels of geomagnetic activity [ Hibberd and Ross , 1967].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%