1995
DOI: 10.1111/j.1600-0633.1995.tb00023.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Variations in the population dynamics of the European eel Anguilla anguilla (L.) along the course of a Cantabrian river

Abstract: Abstract– The size, density and production rate of eel were determined at 16 contrasting sites of 4 streams along the course of a Cantabrian river over the years 1990–1993. In addition, the diel cycles of feeding activity were determined monthly in another tributary over the year 1991–1992. Eels in the Esva were small, short‐lived and mostly males (>99%). The seasonal patterns of eel density, feeding activity and condition were tightly fitted with each other, size‐independent and regulated mainly by water temp… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

8
58
0

Year Published

2003
2003
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
6
1
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 53 publications
(66 citation statements)
references
References 37 publications
8
58
0
Order By: Relevance
“…But the low efficiency of the ladder and reduced size of the active fraction could also be explained by a part of the STST glass eels switching directly to the benthic phase, and hence a longer active migration. The short duration of the active phase would be in line with the short distance covered by glass eels upstream from the tidal limit in freshwater streams (MORIARTY, 1986;NAISMITH and KNIGHTS, 1988;DUTIL et al, 1989, LOBÓN-CERVIÁ et al, 1995. However, other authors (JESSOP, 2000, DUTIL et al, 1989 describe longer migration up to 6-8+ weeks in some rivers, the distance covered reflecting the difficulty of upstream migration due to stream conditions.…”
Section: Fishery and Ladder Efficiencymentioning
confidence: 93%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…But the low efficiency of the ladder and reduced size of the active fraction could also be explained by a part of the STST glass eels switching directly to the benthic phase, and hence a longer active migration. The short duration of the active phase would be in line with the short distance covered by glass eels upstream from the tidal limit in freshwater streams (MORIARTY, 1986;NAISMITH and KNIGHTS, 1988;DUTIL et al, 1989, LOBÓN-CERVIÁ et al, 1995. However, other authors (JESSOP, 2000, DUTIL et al, 1989 describe longer migration up to 6-8+ weeks in some rivers, the distance covered reflecting the difficulty of upstream migration due to stream conditions.…”
Section: Fishery and Ladder Efficiencymentioning
confidence: 93%
“…The active phase probably has a short duration, illustrated by very few glass eels encountered in inland waters. Indeed, glass eels are observed on dams at the tidal head of estuaries (GASCUEL, 1986;McGOVERN and McCARTHY, 1992) but are rarely seen far upstream from the tidal limit in freshwater streams (MORIARTY, 1986;NAISMITH and KNIGHTS, 1988;DUTIL et al, 1989;LOBÓN-CERVIÁ et al, 1995;JESSOP, 2000).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Some studies use the absolute or relative density (e.g. Lobon-Cervia et al, 1995;Ibbotson et al, 2002;Laffaille et al, 2003;Imbert et al, 2008). The problem with this type of data is that the methods available do not allow reliable standardization of the data due to factors such as differing sampling efficiency in shallow versus deep habitats (Naismith and Knights, 1990;Jellyman and Graynoth, 2005).…”
Section: > Assessing Distribution Patterns With Logistic Modelsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The main reason is that colonization is the result of changes in population pressure within a given site, a dynamic process, including immigration, emigration and growth, (LOBÓN-CERVIÁ et al, 1995;FEUNTEUN et al, 2003). To understand this dynamic, eel behaviour can be studied at the experimental level (KNIGHTS, 1987;GLOVA, 2001;GLOVA, 2002).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%