1968
DOI: 10.1177/00220345680470062301
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Variations in the Measurement of Periodontal Disease with Use of Radiographs

Abstract: The gingiva-bone count was used clinically, with posterior bitewing radiographs and with a full survey of 14 apical radiographs to determine variations in scoring of periodontal disease. Neither type of radiograph produced increases in findings large and standard enough to justify use in largescale epidemiologic surveying.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

1968
1968
1979
1979

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 4 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Infrabony pockets may be diffieult to detect on radiographs of teeth (9,25,26,27), and perhaps even more on radiographs of endosseous implants (29). The measured distance may represent alveolar bone in another plane than that ol the implant post, particularly in the posterior regions where the crest has a pronounced bucco-lingual dimension (9). Owing to oblique resorption, the ACreference point may be located at a more superior level than the point of the most apicaliy advanced bone destruction.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Infrabony pockets may be diffieult to detect on radiographs of teeth (9,25,26,27), and perhaps even more on radiographs of endosseous implants (29). The measured distance may represent alveolar bone in another plane than that ol the implant post, particularly in the posterior regions where the crest has a pronounced bucco-lingual dimension (9). Owing to oblique resorption, the ACreference point may be located at a more superior level than the point of the most apicaliy advanced bone destruction.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%