2021
DOI: 10.1017/s002202992100056x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Variations in the levels of acute-phase proteins and lactoferrin in serum and milk during bovine subclinical mastitis

Abstract: Variations in the levels of acute phase proteins and lactoferrin in serum and milk for diagnosis of subclinical mastitis in dairy cows are described in this research paper. Milking animals from two organized dairy farms in Kerala, India, were screened by California Mastitis Test (CMT), Electrical Conductivity test (EC) and Somatic Cell Count (SCC) test to identify animals affected with sub clinical mastitis (SCM). The concentrations of acute phase proteins (APP) Haptoglobin (Hp), C- reactive protein (CRP), Alb… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 32 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Our results showed that biomarker-based ELISAs could be useful diagnostic tools for the detection of subclinical infections, complementing conventional diagnostic methods. However, it is worth mentioning that the use of APPs, such as ORM1, as PTB-biomarkers has some drawbacks as the ELISAs based on the detection of these potential biomarkers can be highly sensitive but sometimes lack specificity as they are found to be elevated in other concurrent inflammatory diseases such as bovine respiratory disease, mastitis, and lameness. IGFBP2 is a potential biomarker of PTB-associated metabolic disorder that would allow a more specific diagnosis. However, its association with these metabolic disorders in PTB should be further investigated.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Our results showed that biomarker-based ELISAs could be useful diagnostic tools for the detection of subclinical infections, complementing conventional diagnostic methods. However, it is worth mentioning that the use of APPs, such as ORM1, as PTB-biomarkers has some drawbacks as the ELISAs based on the detection of these potential biomarkers can be highly sensitive but sometimes lack specificity as they are found to be elevated in other concurrent inflammatory diseases such as bovine respiratory disease, mastitis, and lameness. IGFBP2 is a potential biomarker of PTB-associated metabolic disorder that would allow a more specific diagnosis. However, its association with these metabolic disorders in PTB should be further investigated.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, a comparative test showed that this diagnostic tool’s applicability is limited, and its accuracy is lower compared to other methods, such as the California mastitis test [ 117 , 126 , 127 ]. Other possible biomarkers for mastitis diagnosis, such as procalcitonin (PCT), neopterin (NPT), haptoglobin (HP), serum amyloid A (SAA), proinflammatory cytokines (IL-1β, IL-8, TNF-α, IF-γ) [ 128 , 129 , 130 , 131 , 132 , 133 ], as well as lactose [ 70 ] are now the subject of research and analysis.…”
Section: On-farm and Lab Methods For Monitoring Udder Health And Milk...mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Accordingly, LTF has been considered as an important component in the innate defense mechanisms of the mammary gland against mastitis; it has been reported that clinical mastitis causes a significant increase in LTF gene expression in dairy cattle (Kawai et al, 1999;Chaneton et al, 2008;Swanson et al, 2009). However, the information on LTF gene expression in subclinical staphylococcal infection is limited (Raj et al, 2021) As mastitis can be caused by a range of distinct forms of invasive and pathogenic mechanisms caused by different microorganisms, it is likely to display distinct immune reactions. In fact, different immune responses have been associated with udders infected with S. aureus, S. uberis, and Escherichia coli (Hagiwara et al, 2003;Bannerman et al, 2004;Wellnitz and Kerr, 2004;Swanson et al, 2009).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%