1971
DOI: 10.1016/0032-0633(71)90102-4
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Variations in the high latitude proton trapping boundary associated with polar magnetic substorms

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
9
0

Year Published

1972
1972
1979
1979

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

2
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 26 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 18 publications
0
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This precipitation can explain the anisotropy with peak at 90 ø pitch angle observed in the lower zone in orbit 214, Figure 7. In the poleward zone, the proton fluxes are isotropic, and thus a local dayside source is favored for these particles [Lindalen et al, 1971]. This high-latitude dayside aurora is related to penetration of magnetosheath plasma to low altitudes, as observed by Heikkila and Winningham [1971].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 98%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…This precipitation can explain the anisotropy with peak at 90 ø pitch angle observed in the lower zone in orbit 214, Figure 7. In the poleward zone, the proton fluxes are isotropic, and thus a local dayside source is favored for these particles [Lindalen et al, 1971]. This high-latitude dayside aurora is related to penetration of magnetosheath plasma to low altitudes, as observed by Heikkila and Winningham [1971].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…On the dayside, two zones of protons have been reported for quiet magnetic conditions [Sharp et al, 1967;Lindalen et al, 1971]. The lower zone is probably associated with gradient drifting protons whose origin can be found in the nightside hemisphere.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The magnetospheric trapping boundary has been studied by a number of experimenters using energetic particle data acquired from low-altitude satellites [O'Brien, 1964;Williams and Mead, 1965;McDiarmid and Burrows, 1968;Fritz, 1968Fritz, , 1970Lindalen et al, 1971;Amundsen et al, 1972;Rossberg, 1978]. Various features, such as the drop in counting rate to the background level, the presence of flux enhancements, and the occurrence of isotropy between the trapped and precipitating fluxes, have been used to define the boundary and to study its dependence upon other physical parameters such as local time and geomagnetic activity.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The isotropic pitch angle distribution is strongly favoring a local day side source for the protons precipitating at high latitudes. These protons are found at L values well poleward of the trapping boundary [Lindalen et al, 1971], i.e., possibly in a pseudotrapping region. The fact that we are not observing precipitating protons during quiet conditions in the whole latitude interval accessible to pseudotrapped protons but only at a selected narrow poleward band of latitudes, points also to a local day side source.…”
Section: The Energy Spectrum Fits Nicely With Extrapolation From Specmentioning
confidence: 99%