1913
DOI: 10.5962/bhl.title.43631
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Variations in the composition and properties of milk from the individual cow

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
19
0

Year Published

1927
1927
1967
1967

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 15 publications
(22 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
3
19
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The results indicate that the overall setback is more prominent in the case of the Shorthorns than the Afrikaners, although both breeds suffer markedly from the accepted principle that animals on a low nutritional plane are inclined to use their feed more efficiently than do individuals on a higher nutritional planein the ruminant, however, provided the micro-flora can be maintained. The early studies by Eckles (1913), showing digestibility in the dairy cow to be lower at full feed than at maintenance, have been confirmed by later workers, inter alia Brody (1945), Maynard (1947), Morrison (1947).…”
Section: W -W ---mentioning
confidence: 64%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…The results indicate that the overall setback is more prominent in the case of the Shorthorns than the Afrikaners, although both breeds suffer markedly from the accepted principle that animals on a low nutritional plane are inclined to use their feed more efficiently than do individuals on a higher nutritional planein the ruminant, however, provided the micro-flora can be maintained. The early studies by Eckles (1913), showing digestibility in the dairy cow to be lower at full feed than at maintenance, have been confirmed by later workers, inter alia Brody (1945), Maynard (1947), Morrison (1947).…”
Section: W -W ---mentioning
confidence: 64%
“…Many workers on growth (Waters, 1909;Henseler, 1914;Eckles & Swett, 1918;Trowbridge, Moulton & Haigh, 1918;Lush, Jones, Dameron & Carpenter, 1930;Espe, Cannon & Hansen, 1932;Hammond, 1932;Schutte, 1935;McMeekan, 1938McMeekan, , 1940McMeekan, , 1941Raath, 1941;Bonsma, F. N. 1944;Wallace, 1948;Starke, 1951;Palsson & Verges, 1952;etc. ) have illustrated and stressed the marked influence which environmental conditions and especially nutrition, have thereon.…”
Section: Effects On Growth and Developmentmentioning
confidence: 97%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Owing to lack of other information the various observations on rates of growth of cattle at research stations (Eckles, 1920;Bartlett & Jameson, 1932;Morrison, 1956) have often been described and used as 'standard' growth curves, in spite of the fact that they were usually not presented as representative samples of the respective breeds and the conditions of feeding and management were not necessarily representative of commercial conditions. It could be somewhat misleading to compare growth rates of animals reared under known conditions with these curves.…”
Section: Factors Influencing the Rate Of Live-weight Gain In Calvesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is only one of a number of factors controlling the birth weight. Hammond (1935) has shown that ewes well fed during pregnancy have big lambs; Eckles (1919) found that while diet might affect birth weight, breed was more important. Toverud (1933) found that a good maternal diet in the last month of human pregnancy improved the birth weight.…”
Section: Carbohydratementioning
confidence: 99%