2014
DOI: 10.1111/psyp.12301
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Variations in resting frontal alpha asymmetry between high‐ and low‐neuroticism females across the menstrual cycle

Abstract: Resting frontal alpha asymmetry measures the relative activation intensity across the left and right frontal regions that represent emotional experience. Here, the focus is on levels of alpha asymmetry between high- and low-neuroticism females across the menstrual cycle. Resting alpha asymmetry in healthy females who scored high or low on neuroticism was assessed during the menstrual phase, the late follicular phase, and the midlate luteal phase. High-neuroticism females exhibited lower relative left prefronta… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
22
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 20 publications
(24 citation statements)
references
References 67 publications
2
22
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Only three studies were conducted on a sample equally balanced regarding gender [28,39,44]. However, in some studies, we did not find any information about gender [48] (study 1 presented in the article), [55,67], mean age or standard deviation [26][27][28]33,35,[38][39][40]47,48,[54][55][56]59,60,64,67], and education [38,44,51,52], (see Table 1). Assuming the heterogeneity of the constructs and the paradigms examined, some researchers included confounding variables (such as gender, age, education) and interactional variables (such as sex of experimenters, time of day and time of year, open and closed eyes, and EEG reference) in the statistical analyses.…”
Section: Demographic Featuresmentioning
confidence: 97%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Only three studies were conducted on a sample equally balanced regarding gender [28,39,44]. However, in some studies, we did not find any information about gender [48] (study 1 presented in the article), [55,67], mean age or standard deviation [26][27][28]33,35,[38][39][40]47,48,[54][55][56]59,60,64,67], and education [38,44,51,52], (see Table 1). Assuming the heterogeneity of the constructs and the paradigms examined, some researchers included confounding variables (such as gender, age, education) and interactional variables (such as sex of experimenters, time of day and time of year, open and closed eyes, and EEG reference) in the statistical analyses.…”
Section: Demographic Featuresmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…The studies showed a percentage of men and women variable. In some cases, samples were composed by only women [26,27,57,58,60,66] and, in other cases, there were samples of only men [35], [45] (study 2 presented in the article), [52] (study 3 presented in the article), [53]. Only three studies were conducted on a sample equally balanced regarding gender [28,39,44].…”
Section: Demographic Featuresmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…2. Note that while the validity of a Cz reference electrode for identifying the source of alpha activity has been contested (Hagemann, 2004), it nevertheless remains the most commonly used reference in FAA research (Amd & Roche, 2016;Coan & Allen, 2003;Huang et al, 2015) validating its employment for the present inquiry. For further details, see Footnote 2 in Amd and Roche (2016).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although the details of this matter are beyond the scope of the present article, it suffices to say that Cz has been the most commonly used reference in the FAA research (Coan & Allen, 2003) and continues to be a popular reference of choice (cf. Huang et al, 2014). Given that numerous studies have successfully predicted relationships using the Cz reference, it may be the case that published results utilizing Cz may not only reflect an FAA effect in relation to the construct under investigation, but also sources of variance unique to Cz (Allen, Coan, & Nazarian, 2004).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%