Saint Petersburg 2020 2020
DOI: 10.3997/2214-4609.202053163
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Variations in Ranked List of Reservoir Analogs as an Effect of Search Preferences

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
2
2

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…For example, an important geologic task is to find analogous reservoirs [38]. In terms of time and labour costs, the simplest method to search for reservoir analogues is to consider oil and gas reservoirs located near to the study area [51]. If we consider searching for analogues as a clustering problem in a multidimensional space, it becomes possible to consider various clustering algorithms to solve the problem.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For example, an important geologic task is to find analogous reservoirs [38]. In terms of time and labour costs, the simplest method to search for reservoir analogues is to consider oil and gas reservoirs located near to the study area [51]. If we consider searching for analogues as a clustering problem in a multidimensional space, it becomes possible to consider various clustering algorithms to solve the problem.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There is another way to find reservoir analogues, namely using the similarity function [16]. The difference between the two approaches consists mainly in distributions shapes of reservoir analogues due to more narrow search space made by industry expert [21]. It was also founded that using a manual approach, some experts limit themselves only to local analogues and completely ignore global analogues.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%