The relations among electrical conductivity and graphite content, metamorphic grade, and fluid:rock interaction are investigated for a suite of regionally metamorphosed graphitic carbonate rocks from the Waits River Formation, NE Vermont. Graphitization was complete by the lowest grade of metamorphism attained in the area (-450øC and 450 MPa). In low-grade rocks, graphite occurs as inclusions within calcite and along grain boundaries, and in medium-grade rocks, it concentrates near porphyroblasts. In neither suite does graphite form interconnected networks. Average reduced carbon abundances are 4400 and 2800 ppm for the low-and medium-grade rocks, respectively. High-grade rocks are almost void of graphite, except for one specimen. The •513C values were determined for graphite and carbonates and •5180 values were determined for the carbonates and silicate residues. There is no change in isotopic values between low-and medium-grade rocks. In contrast, highgrade rocks show marked decreases in •5•3C and •5•80 values of-4 %0 compared to low-and medium-grade rocks. Both isotopic analyses and graphite depletion in high-grade rocks were caused by influx of large quantities of magmatic water during peak metamorphism. Electrical conductivity was measured in the laboratory on representative specimens. Rocks with high carbon content (>7000 ppm) from both the low-and high-grade zones display almost an order of magnitude higher electrical conductivity than expected from their fluid content alone. Graphite does not form an interconnected network in these rocks, yet it combines with the saline fluids to significantly increase electrical conductivities. Introduction Elemental carbon is a common constituent of metamorphic rocks, but its character, distribution, and abundance are often neglected in petrologic studies. The source of most of this carbon is organic material deposited in sedimentary environments. Prograde metamorphism converts organic debris into well-ordered graphite by recrystallization and loss of hydrocarbons [e.g., French, 1964; Diessel and Offier, 1975; Hoers and Frey, 1976; Landis, 1971; Buseck and Bo-Jun, 1985; Okuyatna-Kusunose and Itaya, 1987; Wopenka and Pasteris, 1993]. Graphite is electrically conductive, so its presence as an interconnected network may greatly increase the rock's electrical conductivity [Duba and Shankland, 1982; Frost et al., 1989; Mareschal et al., 1992]. In many regions of the world, the middle and lower crust exhibits much higher electrical conductivities than the shallow crust [e.g.dance and distribution of graphite are influenced by metamorphic processes. Although graphite has been reported in many studies of metamorphic rocks, only a few have attempted to examine its microscopic distribution [e.g., Frost et al., 1989; Mareschal et al., 1992; Tingle et al., 1991; Mathez et al., 1995] and none have examined how distribution and abundance change in response to deformation and recrystallization. Accordingly, the goals of this study are to determine (1) the physical distribution of grap...