2019
DOI: 10.1111/fwb.13257
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Variations in fecundity over catchment scales: Implications for caddisfly populations spanning a thermal gradient

Abstract: Population sizes of stream insects depend on the number of eggs that enter the benthos. Densities of oviposited eggs have been linked to densities of oviposition habitat, but variability in fecundity has not been explored. Fecundity may differ between sites where females experience different thermal environments during development, because insects generally grow larger and produce more eggs in cold places (e.g. high elevation and latitude). We predicted that because the fecundity of emerging females should inc… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
8
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

2
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 46 publications
(67 reference statements)
0
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Additionally, individuals from other, down‐valley populations may be contributing to the pool of adults in subalpine ponds, generating demographic compensation through immigration. While we suspect that these organisms are generally not limited from reaching higher‐elevation sites through their dispersal abilities (Bovill et al., 2019), we do not have evidence to quantify the exchange of adults among populations at different elevations. Determining whether the differences in adult body size and survival influence L. picturatus population persistence at subalpine and montane habitats requires examining long‐term demographic data or modeling populations based on body mass–fecundity relationships, survival rates, and estimates of immigration and emigration of adults across elevation (e.g., Kissel et al., 2019).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 85%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Additionally, individuals from other, down‐valley populations may be contributing to the pool of adults in subalpine ponds, generating demographic compensation through immigration. While we suspect that these organisms are generally not limited from reaching higher‐elevation sites through their dispersal abilities (Bovill et al., 2019), we do not have evidence to quantify the exchange of adults among populations at different elevations. Determining whether the differences in adult body size and survival influence L. picturatus population persistence at subalpine and montane habitats requires examining long‐term demographic data or modeling populations based on body mass–fecundity relationships, survival rates, and estimates of immigration and emigration of adults across elevation (e.g., Kissel et al., 2019).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 85%
“…Additionally, individuals from other, down-valley populations may be contributing to the pool of adults in subalpine ponds, generating demographic compensation through immigration. While we suspect that these organisms are generally not limited from reaching higher-elevation sites through their dispersal abilities (Bovill et al, 2019), we do not have evidence to quantify the exchange of adults among populations at different elevations. Determining whether the differences in adult body size and survival influence L.…”
Section: Speciesmentioning
confidence: 90%
“…This result was unexpected for at least one hydrobiosid, Ethochorema turbidum , because it has the biggest wings in our set of species, and hence was expected to be a strong flier (further discussion of wing morphology below). Previous studies suggest that hydrobiosids do fly long distances (Bovill, Downes, & Lancaster, ; Graham et al, ) and such long‐distance movement may reflect behaviours of young adults (Svensson, , ), movement at different times of day or in different locations, e.g. away from river margins, close to the ground or high in the canopy (Collier & Smith, ; Didham et al, ; Svensson, ).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Differing oviposition behaviour is apparently due to species‐specific differences in ability of egg masses to withstand hydraulic forces (Bovill et al., 2013), preferences for specific rock characteristics, and differing aggregation and avoidance behaviours (Lancaster et al., 2020; Reich & Downes, 2003). In addition to differing oviposition preferences, the species vary in average fecundity (Bovill et al., 2019). Eggs take 10–14 days to hatch, although there is high variation driven in part by temperature (Bovill et al., 2013).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%