1986
DOI: 10.1002/ajpa.1330700205
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Variations in enamel thickness and structure in East African hominids

Abstract: Tooth fragments are an appreciable but neglected proportion of fossil hominid specimens. The present study on 47 naturally fractured enamel surfaces of premolar and molar teeth of Plio-Pleistocene East African hominids measured enamel thickness, slope of incremental lines (striae of Retzius), and the morphology of Hunter Schreger bands (HSBs). Specimens allocated to three categories--"robust" australopithecines (EAFROB), "early Homo" (EAFHOM), and "unknown"--were photographed in ethanol with polarised light. E… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

6
114
1
4

Year Published

1996
1996
2013
2013

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 153 publications
(125 citation statements)
references
References 23 publications
6
114
1
4
Order By: Relevance
“…One of these specimens, KNM-ER 1482 (a taxonomically enigmatic mandible) (24,36,37), has a δ 13 C value of −0.4‰. The other, KNM-ER 2607 (a taxonomically enigmatic lower molar fragment) (24,36,38), has a δ 13 C value of −9.2‰.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…One of these specimens, KNM-ER 1482 (a taxonomically enigmatic mandible) (24,36,37), has a δ 13 C value of −0.4‰. The other, KNM-ER 2607 (a taxonomically enigmatic lower molar fragment) (24,36,38), has a δ 13 C value of −9.2‰.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Bromage and Dean (1985) reassessed the age at death of fossil hominids using incremental features, and concluded that early humans were characterized by ape-like dental development, in contrast to the previously assumed modern human pattern. These were followed by many more studies of fossil hominids that examined the nature of enamel development and enamel thickness as revealed by microstructure (Beynon and Wood, 1986;Dean et al, 1986;Beynon and Dean, 1987;Beynon and Wood, 1987;Dean, 1987a,b;Beynon and Dean, 1988;Grine and Martin, 1988;Mann et al, 1991;Beynon, 1992;Dean et al, 1993a;Ramirez Rozzi, 1993a,b;Mann et al, 1994;Ramirez Rozzi, 1994;Dean, 1995;Ramirez Rozzi, 1997;Ramirez Rozzi et al, 1997;Ramirez Rozzi, 1998;). These investigations have provided information on age at death in individuals with developing dentitions, the absolute and relative timing of dental development, differences in the developmental pathways of enamel formation, and life history characteristics.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Physical cross-sections of molar teeth have been used to measure enamel thickness by a number of workers (e.g., Molnar and Gantt, 1977;Martin, 1985;Beynon and Wood, 1986;Grine and Martin, 1988;Macho and Berner, 1993;Dumont, 1995;Schwartz, 2000b;Grine, 2002Grine, , 2004Grine, , 2005Grine et al, 2005). Physical sections provide an accurate portrayal of enamel thickness in a particular plane of section, but problems with specimen orientation (i.e., section obliquity) may render some of these data less than ideal.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%