2013
DOI: 10.2471/blt.12.113100
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Variations in catastrophic health expenditure estimates from household surveys in India

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

7
75
0
1

Year Published

2015
2015
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
10

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 85 publications
(84 citation statements)
references
References 19 publications
7
75
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Third, our expenditure estimates were derived from 14 items with a recall frame of 4 weeks. It has been previously shown that estimates of health expenditure are affected by the methodology used to collect data [3739]. However, the WHS expenditure data had good test-retest reliability [30].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Third, our expenditure estimates were derived from 14 items with a recall frame of 4 weeks. It has been previously shown that estimates of health expenditure are affected by the methodology used to collect data [3739]. However, the WHS expenditure data had good test-retest reliability [30].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Third, our CDHE estimates were based on two questions and a 12-month recall period. There is evidence that estimates of heath spending are lower when using fewer health expenditure questions and longer recall periods [3638]. As the survey did not include questions on total household expenditure, we used household income, as a proxy, in the denominator to estimate CDHE, which may not be responsive to the means of financing health care (savings, loans, selling assets, income transfers, etc.)…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Some studies have used a wide range of threshold criteria, ranging from 5 to 40 % of the household capacity, as the threshold value for defining CHE (Raban et al 2013;Van Minh et al 2013;Wagstaff and Van Doorslaer 2003;Xu et al 2003;Yardim et al 2010;Zhang et al 2010). The most commonly adopted thresholds were in a range from 10 to 40 % in the Korean studies (Kim and Yang 2009;Lee and Shin 2005;Shin et al 2010;Sohn et al 2010;Song and Shin 2010).…”
Section: Catastrophic Health Expenditurementioning
confidence: 96%