All Days 2012
DOI: 10.2118/162265-ms
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Variations in Bounding and Scanning Relative Permeability Curves with Different Carbonate Rock Types

Abstract: Relative permeability curves generally exhibit hysteresis between different saturation cycles. This hysteresis is mainly caused by wettability changes and fluid trapping. Different rock types may experience different hysteresis trends because of variations in pore geometry. Relative permeability curves may also be a function of the saturation height in the reservoir. A detailed laboratory study was performed to investigate relative permeability behavior for a major carbonate hydrocarbon reservoir in the Middle… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 28 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Five waterflooding simulations are carried out using experimental data from Dernaika et al . []. Viscosities are taken as μw=1 cP and μn=2.3824 cP, which are, respectively, reference values for pure water and crude Brent oil (kinematic viscosity of ν=2.86 mm2/s).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Five waterflooding simulations are carried out using experimental data from Dernaika et al . []. Viscosities are taken as μw=1 cP and μn=2.3824 cP, which are, respectively, reference values for pure water and crude Brent oil (kinematic viscosity of ν=2.86 mm2/s).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In homogeneous systems, the hysteresis effect can be negligible. Due to the combined effects of different rock wettability and pore geometries, different types of rock samples exhibit different hysteresis patterns in imbibition relative permeability curves (Dernaika MR et al [58]). Salinity also affects the hysteresis effects of phase permeability experiments, with lower salinity conditions leading to more significant capillary hysteresis (Wang et al [59]).…”
Section: Direct Relative Permeability Measurementsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Geological parameter uncertainties that affect immiscible CO2 WAG injection include the nature and flow significance of faults and subseismic fractures (Bourbiaux et al, 2002;Casabianca et al, 2007;Ramirez et al, 2009) and the role of wettability and hysteresis that control imbibition and drainage in the rock matrix (Okasha et al, 2007;Ferno et al, 2011;Dernaika et al, 2013;Blunt, 1997;Hui & Blunt, 2000;Ryazanov et al, 2009Ryazanov et al, , 2010Killough, 1976;Carlson, 1981;Larsen and Skauge, 1998;Spiteri et al, 2008;Schmid and Geiger, 2013).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The static DFNs are then upscaled to provide adequate permeability distributions for the fracture network (Bourbiaux et al, 2002;Makel, 2007). Knowledge of the wetting preference and its variation in a carbonate reservoir rock is fundamental to understanding flow behaviour during enhanced oil recovery but is difficult to quantify due to the intrinsic heterogeneity of carbonates (Okasha et al, 2007;Ferno et al, 2011;Dernaika et al, 2013;Agada et al, 2014b). Several authors (e.g., Blunt, 1997;Hui & Blunt, 2000;Al-Futaisi and Patzek, 2003, Ryazanov et al, 2009 have demonstrated how wettability changes alter relative permeability functions, using a number of drainage and imbibition simulations where the range of advancing and receding contact angles was modified.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%