1998
DOI: 10.1016/s0022-3476(98)70097-6
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Variations in blood transfusions among newborn intensive care units

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
70
0
1

Year Published

2005
2005
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
7
2
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 139 publications
(72 citation statements)
references
References 26 publications
0
70
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The developing brain of a preterm infant is more vulnerable to the adverse effects of lead exposure as compared to term infants and children; especially since there is growing evidence that there may be no safe lead level (9-11) Even trace amounts of lead exposure in animal models have been shown to impact optimal neurite growth (12). Additionally, preterm infants are also at increased risk for anemia of prematurity and may receive multiple packed red blood cell (pRBC) transfusions during their stay in the neonatal intensive care units with wide variations in guidelines between neonatal intensive care units (13)(14)(15)(16). The pRBC transfusions may thus potentially increase delivery of lead to the preterm infants from the donor pRBC aliquots.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The developing brain of a preterm infant is more vulnerable to the adverse effects of lead exposure as compared to term infants and children; especially since there is growing evidence that there may be no safe lead level (9-11) Even trace amounts of lead exposure in animal models have been shown to impact optimal neurite growth (12). Additionally, preterm infants are also at increased risk for anemia of prematurity and may receive multiple packed red blood cell (pRBC) transfusions during their stay in the neonatal intensive care units with wide variations in guidelines between neonatal intensive care units (13)(14)(15)(16). The pRBC transfusions may thus potentially increase delivery of lead to the preterm infants from the donor pRBC aliquots.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These scoring systems help in predicting mortality and morbidity [20] and thereby can guide us in optimizing the limited health-care resources available in our country. There are various scores devised for neonates in medical literature [21] which includes CRIB [22], CRIB II [23], APACHE, SNAP [22], SNAP II [24], SNAP-PE, SNAPPE-II [25], NTISS [26], Berlin score, NICHHD [27] score; NMPI,NEO-MOD [28]. The choice of which variables to be included in the score and their relative weights is obviously vital.…”
Section: /8mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the absence of uniformly accepted physiologic or evidence-based RBCT criteria, RBCT practices vary greatly between neonatal intensivecare units [1,[6][7][8][9][10] .…”
Section: Potential Risks and Benefits Of Rbctsmentioning
confidence: 99%