Our system is currently under heavy load due to increased usage. We're actively working on upgrades to improve performance. Thank you for your patience.
2020
DOI: 10.1103/physreva.101.032323
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Variational quantum algorithms for dimensionality reduction and classification

Abstract: Dimensionality reduction and classification play an absolutely critical role in pattern recognition and machine learning. In this work, we present a quantum neighborhood preserving embedding and a quantum local discriminant embedding for dimensionality reduction and classification. These two algorithms have an exponential speedup over their respectively classical counterparts. Along the way, we propose a variational quantum generalized eigenvalue solver (VQGE) that finds the generalized eigenvalues and eigenve… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

0
22
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 41 publications
(23 citation statements)
references
References 63 publications
0
22
0
Order By: Relevance
“…(2) The complexity of our algorithm is less than the complexity of VQNPE, even without considering the complexity of the third sub-algorithm of VQNPE. Specifically, The complexity of the first sub-algorithm is O( m 2 ǫ 2 log 2 n), and the complexity of the second sub-algorithm is Ω(poly(n)) (we should mention that the complexity showed here are different with the original paper [26], see Appendix B for details), while the total complexity of our algorithm is O(m 1.5 polylog(mn)) (only consider the main parameters). The advantage of our first sub-algorithm is mainly coming from the parallel estimation of the distance of each pair of data points.…”
Section: The Total Complexity and Comparisonmentioning
confidence: 77%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…(2) The complexity of our algorithm is less than the complexity of VQNPE, even without considering the complexity of the third sub-algorithm of VQNPE. Specifically, The complexity of the first sub-algorithm is O( m 2 ǫ 2 log 2 n), and the complexity of the second sub-algorithm is Ω(poly(n)) (we should mention that the complexity showed here are different with the original paper [26], see Appendix B for details), while the total complexity of our algorithm is O(m 1.5 polylog(mn)) (only consider the main parameters). The advantage of our first sub-algorithm is mainly coming from the parallel estimation of the distance of each pair of data points.…”
Section: The Total Complexity and Comparisonmentioning
confidence: 77%
“…(1) Our algorithm is complete while VQNPE is not. In [26], the authors pointed out that it is not known how to obtain the input of the third sub-algorithm from the output of the second sub-algorithm. (2) The complexity of our algorithm is less than the complexity of VQNPE, even without considering the complexity of the third sub-algorithm of VQNPE.…”
Section: The Total Complexity and Comparisonmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Quantum machine learning is a rapidly expanding domain, bringing promising performance enhancements through complex feature space representations [1][2][3][4][5] and lowering computational complexity of equivalent classical algorithms by exponential factors in cases [6][7][8][9][10][11]. Variational quantum circuits (VQCs) are currently an area of large interest in the field [12][13][14][15][16][17][18][19][20], and provide a natural progression point for developing quantum algorithms due to their optimization capability.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…At the same time, quantum-classical hybrid algorithms-called variational quantum algorithms (VQAs)-are emerging as promising candidates for near-term practical use of quantum processors. VQAs have applications in a wide variety of fields ranging from chemistry to physics and machine learning [5][6][7][8][9][10][11][12][13][14]. VQAs operate by preparing a parameterized trial state on the quantum processor and evaluating a cost function of interest by measuring the state.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%