2009
DOI: 10.1051/m2an/2009043
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Variational particle schemes for the porous medium equation and for the system of isentropic Euler equations

Abstract: Abstract. Both the porous medium equation and the system of isentropic Euler equations can be considered as steepest descents on suitable manifolds of probability measures in the framework of optimal transport theory. By discretizing these variational characterizations instead of the partial differential equations themselves, we obtain new schemes with remarkable stability properties. We show that they capture successfully the nonlinear features of the flows, such as shocks and rarefaction waves for the isentr… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
50
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 49 publications
(50 citation statements)
references
References 14 publications
(30 reference statements)
0
50
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In turn, the PME has many special features: the finite speed of propagation, the free boundary, a possible waiting time phenomenon [5,18]. Various numerical methods have been studied for the PME, such as finite difference approach [8], tracking algorithm method [3], a local discontinuous Galerkin finite element method [24], Variational Particle Scheme (VPS) [23] and an adaptive moving mesh finite element method [13]. Many theoretical analyses have been derived in the existing literature [1,12,14,16,17,18], etc.Relevant detailed descriptions can be found in a recent paper [5], in which the numerical methods for the PME were constructed by an Energetic Variational Approach (EnVarA) to naturally keep the physical laws, such as the conservation of mass, energy dissipation and force balance.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In turn, the PME has many special features: the finite speed of propagation, the free boundary, a possible waiting time phenomenon [5,18]. Various numerical methods have been studied for the PME, such as finite difference approach [8], tracking algorithm method [3], a local discontinuous Galerkin finite element method [24], Variational Particle Scheme (VPS) [23] and an adaptive moving mesh finite element method [13]. Many theoretical analyses have been derived in the existing literature [1,12,14,16,17,18], etc.Relevant detailed descriptions can be found in a recent paper [5], in which the numerical methods for the PME were constructed by an Energetic Variational Approach (EnVarA) to naturally keep the physical laws, such as the conservation of mass, energy dissipation and force balance.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, many existing numerical solutions may contain oscillations near the free boundary, such as PCSFE method (Predictor-Correction Algorithm and Standard Finite element method) [37]. In recent years, a local discontinuous Galerkin finite element method by Zhang & Wu [37] and Variational Particle Scheme (VPS) by Westdickenberg & Wilkening [35] have been used to solve the PME. These two methods can effectively eliminate non-physical oscillation in the computed solution near the free boundary, and lead to a high-order convergence rate within the smooth part of the solution support.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Note that, when f vanishes, the energy in first case is regular while the energy in next two cases is singular. Taking the advantage of the singularity, we can prove that the numerical schemes based on last two energy forms have some good properties which are not possessed by the VPS scheme [35] from the first one, such as conservation of positivity, unique solvability on an admissible convex set, convergence of the corresponding Newton's iteration.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The following result is largely contained in [13] and [29], and included for completeness. (i) Suppose that ρ 0 ∈ P 2 (T) and ρ 0 is absolutely continuous with ρ 0 dρ 0 /dx ∈ L 2 (ρ 0 ), and that q ∈ D 1 (ρ 0 ).…”
Section: )mentioning
confidence: 99%