2020
DOI: 10.1080/15475441.2020.1737071
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Variational Learning in Child L2 Acquisition? Comprehension of Verbal Agreement in Spanish and English

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
0
1

Year Published

2021
2021
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(1 citation statement)
references
References 28 publications
0
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Given the difficulty in generating equivalently appealing visual stimuli to represent different meanings, a measure like the sensitivity computation serves to minimize the potential of a preference for one of the stimulus types and to focus the analysis on genuine comprehension ability. Indeed, in contrast to the results of our accuracy analyses that suggested greater success on plural than on singular trials, sensitivity scores showed that participants were more sensitive to the singular cue than to the plural one – somewhat surprisingly given that it is the plural that is overtly marked (see, e.g., Morales Reyes & Montrul, 2020, on L1 and L2 Spanish comprehension in older children, where accuracy was higher on plural than on singular items).…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 99%
“…Given the difficulty in generating equivalently appealing visual stimuli to represent different meanings, a measure like the sensitivity computation serves to minimize the potential of a preference for one of the stimulus types and to focus the analysis on genuine comprehension ability. Indeed, in contrast to the results of our accuracy analyses that suggested greater success on plural than on singular trials, sensitivity scores showed that participants were more sensitive to the singular cue than to the plural one – somewhat surprisingly given that it is the plural that is overtly marked (see, e.g., Morales Reyes & Montrul, 2020, on L1 and L2 Spanish comprehension in older children, where accuracy was higher on plural than on singular items).…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 99%