2014
DOI: 10.1016/j.infrared.2014.05.018
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Variational infrared image enhancement based on adaptive dual-threshold gradient field equalization

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
11
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 22 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 17 publications
0
11
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Moreover the HVS is very sensitive to intensity changes (gradient) rather than the absolute image intensities. Hence variational infrared image enhancement algorithm based on gradient field equalization [36] was introduced to enhance the gradients specifically with adaptive dual thresholds. The gradients of each pixel in the image form a vector field named as gradient field.…”
Section: Direct Contrast Enhancement Techniquesmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Moreover the HVS is very sensitive to intensity changes (gradient) rather than the absolute image intensities. Hence variational infrared image enhancement algorithm based on gradient field equalization [36] was introduced to enhance the gradients specifically with adaptive dual thresholds. The gradients of each pixel in the image form a vector field named as gradient field.…”
Section: Direct Contrast Enhancement Techniquesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Histogram equalization just tends only to enhance the image (high probability details) whereas Gradient Histogram Equalization enhances the fine edge details of the image. Hence the concept Gradient histogram equalization [36], [42] was utilized in most of the research work. Most of these image enhancement methods are not robust as each approach is geared to handle images degraded at particular level types.…”
Section: Comparisons Between the Techniquesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Histograms of gradients basically provide information about the occurrence of gradient orientations in a localized region of the images. Hence, they are able to characterize shapes in regions of concern (Santhi and Wahida Banu, 2015;Randa and Rabab Farouk, 2015;Lidong et al, 2015;Honglie et al, 2015;Kuldeep et al, 2015;Xiangzhi, 2015;Wenda et al, 2014;Jing and Nor Ashidi, 2014;Mohammad Farhan et al, 2014b;2014a;Kuldeep and Rajiv, 2014a;Chien-Cheng et al, 2014).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…With the maturity of the surface roughness detection technology, all the thermal infrared imagers today have extremely high dynamic range (HDR), which can reach up to 14 bits or even higher (in this paper, 14 bits is adopted as an example) [1,2]. The relatively high dynamic range ensures that the thermal imager can still clearly distinguish the details of the temperature change in the scene where the temperature change is extremely great [3][4][5]. However, high dynamic range can cause a mismatching issue between the original image captured and the back-end device [6,7].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%