2022
DOI: 10.31223/x5x07f
|View full text |Cite
Preprint
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Variational inference of ice shelf rheology with physics-informed machine learning

Abstract: Floating ice shelves that fringe the coast of Antarctica resist the flow of grounded ice into the ocean. One of the key factors governing the amount of flow-resistance provided by an ice shelf is the rigidity of the ice that constitutes it. Ice rigidity is highly heterogeneous and must be calibrated from spatially-continuous surface observations assimilated into an ice flow model. Moreover, realistic uncertainties in calibrated rigidity values are needed to quantify uncertainties in forecasts of future shelf f… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
1
1

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 12 publications
(17 reference statements)
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Current ice flow models do not account for an evolving ice rate factor in transient simulations, thus the accuracy of their projections remains restricted. Recent advances adopting a novel physic informed machine learning framework have tested a complementary approach to calibrate uncertainties in the ice rate factor and sea level forecasts, by inferring a posterior distribution of the ice rate factor (Riel and Minchew, 2023), providing some insights on better and continuously updated calibrations of ice flow parameters. To further reduce these errors in the ice rate factor field when adopting more conventional inversion procedures, it remains crucial for future efforts to prioritize the monitoring of ice shelves' velocity, geometry, and calving front positions, which are essential parameters for accurate estimates of sea level forecasts.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Current ice flow models do not account for an evolving ice rate factor in transient simulations, thus the accuracy of their projections remains restricted. Recent advances adopting a novel physic informed machine learning framework have tested a complementary approach to calibrate uncertainties in the ice rate factor and sea level forecasts, by inferring a posterior distribution of the ice rate factor (Riel and Minchew, 2023), providing some insights on better and continuously updated calibrations of ice flow parameters. To further reduce these errors in the ice rate factor field when adopting more conventional inversion procedures, it remains crucial for future efforts to prioritize the monitoring of ice shelves' velocity, geometry, and calving front positions, which are essential parameters for accurate estimates of sea level forecasts.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These artifacts are amplified by conventional (explicit) spatial derivatives and map onto the melt-rate estimates. Opticalderived velocities lack continental coverage and contain artifacts in places (Riel and Minchew, 2023). For this reason, we derive velocity fields by blending multiple products.…”
Section: Ice Velocity Fieldsmentioning
confidence: 99%