2009
DOI: 10.1103/physreva.80.032508
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Variational determination of the second-order density matrix for the isoelectronic series of beryllium, neon, and silicon

Abstract: The isoelectronic series of Be, Ne, and Si are investigated using a variational determination of the secondorder density matrix. A semidefinite program was developed that exploits all rotational and spin symmetries in the atomic system. We find that the method is capable of describing the strong static electron correlations due to the incipient degeneracy in the hydrogenic spectrum for increasing central charge. Apart from the groundstate energy, various other properties are extracted from the variationally de… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
78
1

Year Published

2011
2011
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

3
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 65 publications
(79 citation statements)
references
References 25 publications
(32 reference statements)
0
78
1
Order By: Relevance
“…We remark that with this choice of the basis sets, especially for ionic systems, our HF and CCSD(T) results differ from benchmark results 88,89 . Nevertheless, because the main goal of the present work is to perform a relative (and mostly qualitative) comparison between different methods and because all the exchange-only as well as all the XC methods considered here have a similar basis set convergence behaviour (almost linear for exchange and cubic for correlation), the analysis of the different results is expected to be only slightly influenced by this issue.…”
Section: Basis-setscontrasting
confidence: 71%
“…We remark that with this choice of the basis sets, especially for ionic systems, our HF and CCSD(T) results differ from benchmark results 88,89 . Nevertheless, because the main goal of the present work is to perform a relative (and mostly qualitative) comparison between different methods and because all the exchange-only as well as all the XC methods considered here have a similar basis set convergence behaviour (almost linear for exchange and cubic for correlation), the analysis of the different results is expected to be only slightly influenced by this issue.…”
Section: Basis-setscontrasting
confidence: 71%
“…Even better, at any point during the optimization, the error on the current value is limited from above by the primal-dual gap. Note that in our previous implementation [20], a dual-only algorithm was used. (The assignation of a problem as "primal" or "dual" is largely matter of convention.…”
Section: Primal-dual Semidefinite Programmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Direct calculation of the reduced variables, however, requires that they and their functionals be consistent with a realistic N -electron quantum system; in other words, the reduced variables and functionals must be representable by the integration of an N -electron density matrix. Such consistency relations are known as the N -representability conditions [1][2][3][4][5][6][7][8][9][10][11][12][13][14][15][16][17][18][20][21][22][23][24]. These conditions are particularly important to 2-RDM methods where they enable the direct calculation of the 2-RDM without the wavefunction, but they are also implicit in the design of realistic approximations to the density functional in density functional theory [31,32].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%