2021
DOI: 10.1007/s40818-021-00106-1
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Variational Approach to Regularity of Optimal Transport Maps: General Cost Functions

Abstract: We extend the variational approach to regularity for optimal transport maps initiated by Goldman and the first author to the case of general cost functions. Our main result is an $$\epsilon $$ ϵ -regularity result for optimal transport maps between Hölder continuous densities slightly more quantitative than the result by De Philippis–Figalli. One of the new contributions is the use of almost-minimality: if the cost is quantitatively close to the Euclidean cost function, a mini… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
2
1

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 25 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The key tool in the proof was a version of Theorem 1.1 in this setting. In later papers, continuous densities [5], rougher measures [7], more general cost functions (albeit still close to the quadratic cost functional) [15], as well as almost-minimisers of the quadratic cost functional [15] were considered. The quadratic version of Theorem 1.1 was also used to provide a more refined linearisation result of (1.2) in the quadratic set-up in [7] and of a similar statement in the context of optimal matching in [6].…”
Section: Moreovermentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The key tool in the proof was a version of Theorem 1.1 in this setting. In later papers, continuous densities [5], rougher measures [7], more general cost functions (albeit still close to the quadratic cost functional) [15], as well as almost-minimisers of the quadratic cost functional [15] were considered. The quadratic version of Theorem 1.1 was also used to provide a more refined linearisation result of (1.2) in the quadratic set-up in [7] and of a similar statement in the context of optimal matching in [6].…”
Section: Moreovermentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The key tool in the proof was a version of Theorem 1.1 in this setting. In later papers, continuous densities [6], rougher measures [8], more general cost functions (albeit still close to the quadratic cost functional) [21], as well as almost-minimisers of the quadratic cost functional [21] were considered. The quadratic version of Theorem 1.1 was also used to provide a more refined linearisation result of (1.2) in the quadratic set-up in [8] and of a similar statement in the context of optimal matching in [7].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%