2003
DOI: 10.1002/cyto.a.10061
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Variation of the genome size estimate with environmental conditions in Drosophila melanogaster

Abstract: Background: Genome size is known to exhibit interspecies differences, but also to vary between populations within a given species and even between individual cells within an organism. Major differences have often been reported and attributed to differences in measurement conditions, in internal controls of genome size, and in the stains used. Flow cytometry using intercalating dyes is the most attractive method for measuring genome size. Methods: We estimated relative genome size of nuclei from heads of Drosop… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
27
2

Year Published

2005
2005
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 18 publications
(29 citation statements)
references
References 39 publications
0
27
2
Order By: Relevance
“…In D. melanogaster, non site-specific non-LTR retrotransposons are usually either recently transposed euchromatic elements dispersed on all chromosome arms, or defective elements accumulated in pericentromeric heterochromatin (Dimitri and Junakovic, 1999). Molecular cytology helps in understanding the distribution and localization of mobile elements even at the population level, by providing a tool for investigating genome size variations along with factors like the geographical or environmental conditions (see, for instance, Nardon et al, 2003). However, the distribution of repeated elements has been relatively poorly documented in fish genomes, and earlier studies have mainly focused on otherwise uncharacterized satellite sequences (for a review, see Phillips, 2001).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In D. melanogaster, non site-specific non-LTR retrotransposons are usually either recently transposed euchromatic elements dispersed on all chromosome arms, or defective elements accumulated in pericentromeric heterochromatin (Dimitri and Junakovic, 1999). Molecular cytology helps in understanding the distribution and localization of mobile elements even at the population level, by providing a tool for investigating genome size variations along with factors like the geographical or environmental conditions (see, for instance, Nardon et al, 2003). However, the distribution of repeated elements has been relatively poorly documented in fish genomes, and earlier studies have mainly focused on otherwise uncharacterized satellite sequences (for a review, see Phillips, 2001).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Significant variation in genome size was observed in D. melanogaster when the insects were reared at various temperatures and humidities (Nardon et al 2003). Also, the age of the insects and the temperature of the nuclei solution prior to flow cytometry resulted in a variable genome size in Drosophila (Nardon et al 2003). Older insects had a smaller genome size, whereas a low humidity during insect rearing increased the genome size significantly.…”
Section: Genome Sizementioning
confidence: 93%
“…Apparently, the genome sizes of Trichogramma species are quite different. However, part of these differences can be attributed to variation in the environmental conditions during the experiments (Nardon et al 2003). Significant variation in genome size was observed in D. melanogaster when the insects were reared at various temperatures and humidities (Nardon et al 2003).…”
Section: Genome Sizementioning
confidence: 98%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Several recent reviews and commentaries have covered the following areas: the technical limitations of Feulgen cytometry in nuclear DNA amount estimation (Nardon et al, 2003;Greilhuber, 2008), phenotypic impacts of repetitive DNA in flowering plants (Meagher and Vassiliadis, 2005), rapid changes in plant genomes (Henikoff, 2005), the types of somagenetic variations that usually do not change the genome size (Li, 2008) and nuclear gene-induced mitochondrial DNA variation (Abdelnoor et al, 2003;Albert et al, 2003). This review gives emphasis to the variation that affects the nuclear genome size or DNA content.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%