2016
DOI: 10.1177/1475472x16630888
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Variation of shock-spacing during screech stage-jumps

Abstract: Flow visualization is used to investigate shock-spacings in a supersonic jet during stage-jumps associated with the screech phenomenon. Conventional schlieren and shadowgraphy techniques as well as a new projection focusing schlieren technique are employed. Both time-averaged and instantaneous snapshots of the flow field are analyzed for a 37.6 mm round convergent nozzle over the jet Mach number range of 1.0 < M j < 1.7. Shock-spacing is studied especially during hysteresis of the stage-jumps where two differe… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 30 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…uncertainties are insignificant in comparison to the margin of error pointed out on k s . The modulation wavenumber is found to be larger than the shock cell wavenumber by a few per cent, except for the case M j = 1.15 that exhibits k sw 28 % larger than k sc because of the jump in frequency, whereas no change in aerodynamic characteristics of the jet is observed (Clem, Zaman & Fagan 2016). The second largest k − sw in comparison to k sc is found for case M j = 1.13: k − sw is 10 % larger than k sc .…”
Section: Wavenumber-frequency Spectrum Analysismentioning
confidence: 72%
“…uncertainties are insignificant in comparison to the margin of error pointed out on k s . The modulation wavenumber is found to be larger than the shock cell wavenumber by a few per cent, except for the case M j = 1.15 that exhibits k sw 28 % larger than k sc because of the jump in frequency, whereas no change in aerodynamic characteristics of the jet is observed (Clem, Zaman & Fagan 2016). The second largest k − sw in comparison to k sc is found for case M j = 1.13: k − sw is 10 % larger than k sc .…”
Section: Wavenumber-frequency Spectrum Analysismentioning
confidence: 72%
“…However, in Tam et al (1986) and the body of work that followed, it was typically assumed that higher-order shock cell modes could be neglected, thus returning to an equivalence in the application of the two models. Equation (1.1) can produce accurate predictions of screech frequency for some jet operating conditions; however, it is unable to account for the modal staging behaviour of jet screech, as neither the convection velocity nor the shock spacing has been observed to change in a discontinuous manner with changes in operating condition (Clem, Zaman & Fagan 2016;Mercier, Castelain & Bailly 2017).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Equation can produce accurate predictions of screech frequency for some jet operating conditions; however, it is unable to account for the modal staging behaviour of jet screech, as neither the convection velocity nor the shock spacing has been observed to change in a discontinuous manner with changes in operating condition (Clem, Zaman & Fagan 2016; Mercier, Castelain & Bailly 2017).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%