2010
DOI: 10.1016/j.bios.2009.10.005
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Variation of power generation at different buffer types and conductivities in single chamber microbial fuel cells

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
44
0
2

Year Published

2010
2010
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 139 publications
(51 citation statements)
references
References 23 publications
1
44
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…A theory recently proposed is that these underperformances result from ionic and electrical depletion at the lower resistance values [6]. Another suggestion is that it is the result of an insufficient sample rate such that the microbial contingent are not given enough time to adjust to each new resistance value [9], resulting in a rapidly declining voltage that is still dropping when the next new resistance is introduced. Much advancement has been made in recent years suggesting that the scale-up of MFC technology could be achievable.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A theory recently proposed is that these underperformances result from ionic and electrical depletion at the lower resistance values [6]. Another suggestion is that it is the result of an insufficient sample rate such that the microbial contingent are not given enough time to adjust to each new resistance value [9], resulting in a rapidly declining voltage that is still dropping when the next new resistance is introduced. Much advancement has been made in recent years suggesting that the scale-up of MFC technology could be achievable.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In regard to a BES, conductivity of the wastewater is often considered to significantly influence the performance (Nam et al, 2010). Unlike to adding solid electron donors, DW as electron donor source would dilute the original azo dye containing wastewater and consequently can decrease the conductivity in mixed wastewater, which could ostensibly make the DW as electrode donor source doubtful.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Two possible factors led to this close sulfide removal loadings under different buffer conditions: i) inadequate sulfide supply; ii) inconsiderable effect of buffer on spontaneous electrochemical oxidation of sulfide. Besides maintaining stable pH for microorganisms, buffer affects the power generation of MFC mainly by influencing solution conductivity [15]. Low power density and nitrate removal loading but high internal resistance were obtained under buffer free condition.…”
Section: Performance Of Denitrifying Sulfide Removal Mfc With Differementioning
confidence: 98%
“…When the performance of power recovery and pollutant removal were both considered, attention on factors such as buffer, hydraulic retention time (HRT) and temperature would be paid. The buffer affects MFC performance by interaction with the electrodes, bacteria, and membrane [15,16]. HRT has a considerable effect on the power generation and pollutant removal performance of MFC mainly through varying substrate supply and mass transport [13,17].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%