2012
DOI: 10.48550/arxiv.1203.6643
|View full text |Cite
Preprint
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Variation of geometric invariant theory quotients and derived categories

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

6
124
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 48 publications
(133 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
6
124
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Combining these with the previous paragraph, we conclude that the two positive real roots at r = 0 come together on the positive real axis for the first time at r = b. 2 Moreover, using from two paragraphs ago, it follows that the critical points above the two positive real critical values of w r (as elements of C n ) come together at the unique singular point p = (p 1 , . .…”
Section: 3supporting
confidence: 64%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Combining these with the previous paragraph, we conclude that the two positive real roots at r = 0 come together on the positive real axis for the first time at r = b. 2 Moreover, using from two paragraphs ago, it follows that the critical points above the two positive real critical values of w r (as elements of C n ) come together at the unique singular point p = (p 1 , . .…”
Section: 3supporting
confidence: 64%
“…As was observed in [7], there is a natural such functor arising from the VGIT machinery of Ballard-Favero-Katzarkov [2]. The next step, based on explicit computations with matrix factorizations, is the identification of the image under the above functor of the exceptional collection e a− with the left dual of the initial segment of the exceptional collection e a .…”
Section: Conjecture 122mentioning
confidence: 91%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Finally we show the schober conditions. The required equivalences between D(X − ) and D(X + ) are explained above (2). For the equivalences between the orthogonals, these are generated by single objects, and therefore by symmetry it suffice to prove the following lemma.…”
Section: B-side Constructionsmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…We use a general construction of Coates, Iritani, Jiang, and Segal [9] to realize the blowup p − as a variation of GIT. We then use standard technology which relates derived categories under variation of GIT [2,19] to obtain a semi-orthogonal decomposition. The semi-orthogonal decomposition for p + follows by an appropriate adaptation of this argument.…”
Section: B-side Constructionsmentioning
confidence: 99%