2016
DOI: 10.1515/crelle-2015-0096
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Variation of geometric invariant theory quotients and derived categories

Abstract: We study the relationship between derived categories of factorizations on gauged Landau-Ginzburg models related by variations of the linearization in Geometric Invariant Theory. Under assumptions on the variation, we show the derived categories are comparable by semi-orthogonal decompositions and describe the complementary components. We also verify a question posed by Kawamata: we show that D-equivalence and K-equivalence coincide for such variations. The results are applied to obtain a simple inductive descr… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

4
169
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
4

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 101 publications
(173 citation statements)
references
References 73 publications
(122 reference statements)
4
169
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Instead, we expect that the quantum cohomology of X + would contain the quantum cohomology of X − as a direct summand after analytic continuation. This is analogous to the conjecture that D b (X + ) contains D b (X − ) as a semiorthogonal summand [13,71,72,9], where D b (X ± ) denotes the derived category of coherent sheaves on X ± . In this paper, we describe a decomposition of quantum cohomology D-modules (and of all genus Gromov-Witten potentials) for toric Deligne-Mumford stacks under discrepant transformations.…”
supporting
confidence: 62%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Instead, we expect that the quantum cohomology of X + would contain the quantum cohomology of X − as a direct summand after analytic continuation. This is analogous to the conjecture that D b (X + ) contains D b (X − ) as a semiorthogonal summand [13,71,72,9], where D b (X ± ) denotes the derived category of coherent sheaves on X ± . In this paper, we describe a decomposition of quantum cohomology D-modules (and of all genus Gromov-Witten potentials) for toric Deligne-Mumford stacks under discrepant transformations.…”
supporting
confidence: 62%
“…. , x n , we shall regard GM T (F ) as an O M ⊗ R T [z]-module; then GM T (F ) is not of rank one as such 9 . We shall also regard GM T (F ) as a flat connection (i.e.…”
Section: Mirror Symmetrymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The endpoint of this run is P n , and the birational map P n V n is described above (blow up the torus invariants points of P n and then inductively flip the linear subspaces of dimension d < m, where n = 2m). To understand how the derived category is affected under such modifications, it will be advantageous to present the process as a variation of GIT quotients of the spectrum of the Cox ring of the blow up of P n using [BFK17,Bal17].…”
Section: Generation Via Windowsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…I review results from GIT sufficient to recall, from previous work [12], a construction of a spherical pair for certain GIT wall crossings: this is Theorem 5.9. For further details on GIT, I refer the reader to treatments of Halpern-Leistner [20], and Ballard, Favero, and Katzarkov [4].…”
Section: Geometric Invariant Theorymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The T w are spherical twists obtained by Halpern-Leistner and Shipman [21], and the Φ w are window equivalences as given by Halpern-Leistner [20], and Ballard-Favero-Katzarkov [4].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%