2004
DOI: 10.1016/j.minpro.2003.09.001
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Variation of critical surface tension for wetting of minerals with roughness determined by Surtronic 3+ instrument

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
10

Relationship

1
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 27 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 13 publications
(14 reference statements)
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…very strong basic sites containing O and N atoms in hetero-cycle conjugated structure. 32 We assume that very small nanoparticles are indeed stabilized at these sites. 19,20 The as-received CNT realizes a good support-PVA interaction (0.8% Pd loading) but the low concentration of functional sites leads, during the immobilization, to overgrowth of the MTP (Fig.…”
Section: Morphology and Structure Of The Pd Nanoparticlesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…very strong basic sites containing O and N atoms in hetero-cycle conjugated structure. 32 We assume that very small nanoparticles are indeed stabilized at these sites. 19,20 The as-received CNT realizes a good support-PVA interaction (0.8% Pd loading) but the low concentration of functional sites leads, during the immobilization, to overgrowth of the MTP (Fig.…”
Section: Morphology and Structure Of The Pd Nanoparticlesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Some researchers have also investigated the effect of surface roughness of coal dust on the wettability. However, the obtained conclusions by these researchers on this topic were different and even contrary [53][54][55][56]. At present, regarding the influence of the surface roughness on the wettability of coal dust, the accepted conclusion is that as the surface of coal dust gets rougher, the wettability is better [57,58].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 94%
“…The grinding tests were used as the same method of previously reported studies [34,35] as summarized in Table 2. Two conventional mills, namely laboratory ball (200 x184 mm) and rod mills (200 x 280 mm) were performed in dry conditions using with 5 475 kg of stainless steel balls of 30 and 26 mm and 22 600 kg of stainless steel rods of 29, 24 and 19 mm in size, respectively.…”
Section: Grinding Testsmentioning
confidence: 99%