2006
DOI: 10.1016/j.scienta.2006.01.020
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Variation in total phenolics and antioxidant capacity among European plum genotypes

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

7
44
0
2

Year Published

2010
2010
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
6
3

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 91 publications
(53 citation statements)
references
References 17 publications
7
44
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…The correlation coefficient between the total phenolic content and free radical scavenging activity of DPPH and ABTS were r 2 = 0.970 and 0.978, respectively (see Figures 1 and 2). Quite a number of authors (Rupasinghe et al, 2006;Moyer et al, 2002;Jurikova and Matuskovic, 2007) refers to high correlation dependence of polyphenols and antioxidant activity in different fruit species. What is more interesting, the highest content of phenolic substances and antioxidant activity was measured in the cultivars ´Titus´ and ´Vydubeckij´, which are Russian in origin.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The correlation coefficient between the total phenolic content and free radical scavenging activity of DPPH and ABTS were r 2 = 0.970 and 0.978, respectively (see Figures 1 and 2). Quite a number of authors (Rupasinghe et al, 2006;Moyer et al, 2002;Jurikova and Matuskovic, 2007) refers to high correlation dependence of polyphenols and antioxidant activity in different fruit species. What is more interesting, the highest content of phenolic substances and antioxidant activity was measured in the cultivars ´Titus´ and ´Vydubeckij´, which are Russian in origin.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In its radical form, DPPH + absorbs light at 515 nm, but upon reduction by an antioxidant or a radical species, the absorption disappears (Thaipong et al, 2006). In both methods the calculated activity was converted using a calibration curve of the standard and expressed in ascorbic acid equivalents (AAE) (Rupasinghe et al, 2006).…”
Section: Total Phenolic Content (Tpc) and Free Radical Scavenging Assaymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Antioxidant activity was calculated as a decrease in the absorbance value using the formula: (%)=(A0-A1/A0)×100%, where A0 is the absorbance of the control (without the sample), and A1 is the absorbance of the mixture containing the sample. The absorbance results were converted using a standard calibration curve and expressed in ascorbic acid equivalents (AAE) [26]. This protocol was repeated three times for each flower extract.…”
Section: Antioxidant Activitymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Then the absorbance was taken at 515 nm. The antioxidant activity was calculated as a decrease in absorbance value using the equation: The results of absorbance were converted using a calibration curve of the standard and expressed in ascorbic acid equivalents (AAE) (Rupasinghe et al 2006). For comparison, the extract providing 50% of radical scavenging activity (IC 50 , the concentration of the sample to scavenge 50% of the DPPH radicals) was calculated from the graph of radical scavenging activity percentage against extract concentration.…”
Section: Antioxidant Activity By the Dpph Test Assaymentioning
confidence: 99%