2022
DOI: 10.1016/j.jpra.2022.10.004
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Variation in the use of infection control measures and infection-related revision incidence after breast implant surgery in the Netherlands

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(2 citation statements)
references
References 28 publications
(37 reference statements)
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The incidence of infection-related revisions in the Netherlands is very low, 0.1% in augmentation and 2.1% in reconstruction. 1 This highlights the importance of large perhaps European initiated randomized trials.…”
Section: ]] ]] ]]mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The incidence of infection-related revisions in the Netherlands is very low, 0.1% in augmentation and 2.1% in reconstruction. 1 This highlights the importance of large perhaps European initiated randomized trials.…”
Section: ]] ]] ]]mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This may explain the discrepancy in antiseptic measures between Dutch institutions between 2015 and 2019. 1 The most recent guidelines regarding breast implant surgery of the Dutch Association of Plastic Surgeons (NVPC) were published in 2020. 2 We distributed a survey through the NVPC to identify current trends and discuss antiseptic measures in the Netherlands.…”
Section: Antiseptic Measures In Breast Implant Surgery: a Survey Amon...mentioning
confidence: 99%