2016
DOI: 10.1590/1678-4499.170
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Variation in the sugar yield in response to drying-off of sugarcane before harvest and the occurrence of low air temperatures

Abstract: AbstrAct:The need to irrigate sugarcane in the Brazilian Savanna is due to the lack of rain from April to September. For efficient sugar accumulation, the crop needs water stress or heat stress at the maturation stage. However, when the water deficit is intense at this stage, it occurs the reduction in crop production. The objective of this study was: (i) to assess the quality of the raw material of days before harvest, period in which the crop irrigation could be interrupted. The water deficit of 37.76 mm app… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

1
4
0
1

Year Published

2018
2018
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 18 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 12 publications
1
4
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…For the soil with low SWHC with harvest in October and November in Mocambinho (Figure ), near to Jaíba, the drying‐off days ranged from 22 to 33, considering the percentiles for 25 and 75%. In an experiment conducted with 15‐month plant cane harvested in mid‐September in an Oxisol of medium texture, near Pirenópolis, GO, Araújo et al () found 30 days as the best drying‐off period for sugarcane harvest, which is similar to the results obtained for the same month of harvesting in the present study, between 21 and 31 days for harvests between September and October in Pirenópolis (Figure ). Although the experimental results provide valuable information for model assessment, they normally consider few growing seasons, harvest periods and agro‐climatic conditions, being limited by them.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 89%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…For the soil with low SWHC with harvest in October and November in Mocambinho (Figure ), near to Jaíba, the drying‐off days ranged from 22 to 33, considering the percentiles for 25 and 75%. In an experiment conducted with 15‐month plant cane harvested in mid‐September in an Oxisol of medium texture, near Pirenópolis, GO, Araújo et al () found 30 days as the best drying‐off period for sugarcane harvest, which is similar to the results obtained for the same month of harvesting in the present study, between 21 and 31 days for harvests between September and October in Pirenópolis (Figure ). Although the experimental results provide valuable information for model assessment, they normally consider few growing seasons, harvest periods and agro‐climatic conditions, being limited by them.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 89%
“…Recommendations about drying‐off in irrigated sugarcane fields are still scarce in Brazil, with the few studies that exist presenting contrasting results (Teixeira ; Vieira et al ; Barbosa, 2015; Araújo et al ). Therefore, there is still controversy regarding the drying‐off strategy before harvest for irrigated sugarcane, since most of the experiments are restricted to specific locations and years.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Precipitation determines the amount of sucrose accumulated at the moment of harvesting, but different soil types can store water in different proportions, what may affect the sugarcane ripening (Cardozo et al 2015). On the other hand, air temperatures and water deficits are effective ripening agents, because they reduce the moisture of the sugarcane stalk (Araújo et al 2016). For van Heerden (2014), there is an inverse relation between the sucrose concentrations in cane and the minimum mean air temperature.…”
Section: Abstract Resumomentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This is due to the lower cost of lands when compared to traditional areas of occupation of the crop (e.g., São Paulo), besides the suitable terrain, infrastructure, and average distance to the main consumer markets (Silva & Miziara, 2011). On the other hand, Goiás presents disadvantages compared to the state of São Paulo such as a more significant water deficit (Marin & Nassif, 2013;Araújo et al, 2016), and difficulty in the adoption of varieties adapted to the edaphoclimatic conditions of the region (Campos et al, 2014a(Campos et al, , 2014b.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%