2020
DOI: 10.1002/ece3.6181
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Variation in the ontogenetic allometry of horn length in bovids along a body mass continuum

Abstract: Allometric relationships describe patterns of proportional covariation between morphological, physiological, or life-history traits and the size of the organisms among populations or species (evolutionary allometry), or within population, among individuals measured at similar (static allometry), or different (ontogenetic allometry) age or developmental stages. When expressed on a log-log scale, allometric relationships are often described by a linear regression: log(y) = a + b log(x) where y is the trait size;… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
8
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 68 publications
0
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The level of mate monopolisation can be linked to various forms of sexual dimorphism, such as difference in body size, colouring, shape and size of weaponry (Andersson 1994). In bovids, body mass and horn size are targets of sexual selection (Bro‐Jørgensen 2007, Tidière et al 2020); horn size, however, may also depend on combat style, so horn dimorphism is less likely to be related to polygyny than body mass. Therefore, sexual dimorphism in the Caprinae was categorised primarily on the basis of body mass dimorphism, into four classes: ‘low’ (<10%), ‘medium‐low’ (10–30%), ‘medium‐high’ (30–50%) and ‘high’ (>50%).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The level of mate monopolisation can be linked to various forms of sexual dimorphism, such as difference in body size, colouring, shape and size of weaponry (Andersson 1994). In bovids, body mass and horn size are targets of sexual selection (Bro‐Jørgensen 2007, Tidière et al 2020); horn size, however, may also depend on combat style, so horn dimorphism is less likely to be related to polygyny than body mass. Therefore, sexual dimorphism in the Caprinae was categorised primarily on the basis of body mass dimorphism, into four classes: ‘low’ (<10%), ‘medium‐low’ (10–30%), ‘medium‐high’ (30–50%) and ‘high’ (>50%).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although analyzing allometric relationship between horn length and some skeletal measurement would provide less biased estimates of the allometric slope, data for skeletal measurements are not available for all studied species. More generally, these data are scarce for bovids (Tidière et al 2020) and they tend to be error prone (Martin et al 2013).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A growing evidence suggests that SD can vary substantially among evolutionary lineages and populations within species (e.g. Sacchi et al, 2015; Tidière et al, 2020; Webb & Freckleton, 2007). Stage‐ and taxon‐specific sexually dimorphic traits (Badyaev, 2002) have also been documented, as well as Rensch's rule that considers the systematic pattern of sex differences in sexual size dimorphism (SSD) within and among species (Rensch, 1959).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%