2013
DOI: 10.1557/jmr.2013.285
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Variation in the nanoindentation hardness of platinum

Abstract: Pure platinum was probed with a nanoindenter fitted with a Berkovich tip to various depths. The indent pattern was made on the as-polished specimen prior to heat treating, after heat treating at 500°C for 30 min, and again after further heat treating at 1000°C for 30 min. The variability in the measured hardness decreased as the indentation depth increased from 50 to 300 nm. When the sampled was annealed, the hardness variation was also greater. Increasing hardness variation with decreasing dislocation density… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
4
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 53 publications
1
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The hardness was measured at contact depths ranging between 90 nm to 170 nm, ≈10% of the film thickness; deep enough to be deeper than the spherical tip asperity and shallow enough to avoid significant substrate effects. [17] Since other researchers have identified hardness changes with similar annealing conditions [2,22] and changes in structure (i.e. Cr precipitation growth), we expect a similar type of precipitation occurs in this study, albeit with less precipitation (size and possible volume fraction) at these lower annealing temperatures.…”
Section: Figure 3 Transition State Energy Of Diffusion Process Calcusupporting
confidence: 74%
“…The hardness was measured at contact depths ranging between 90 nm to 170 nm, ≈10% of the film thickness; deep enough to be deeper than the spherical tip asperity and shallow enough to avoid significant substrate effects. [17] Since other researchers have identified hardness changes with similar annealing conditions [2,22] and changes in structure (i.e. Cr precipitation growth), we expect a similar type of precipitation occurs in this study, albeit with less precipitation (size and possible volume fraction) at these lower annealing temperatures.…”
Section: Figure 3 Transition State Energy Of Diffusion Process Calcusupporting
confidence: 74%
“…S4). One should take note of the fact that the scatter bars of the measurements overlap due to the intrinsically increasing stochasticity for small-depth indentation (44). However, having >25 indents for each measurement should lend some credibility to the average values.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Nanoindentation requires relatively large few micron-sized sample volumes, and the scarce data obtainable so far is summarized in Figure 18. Nanoindentation hardness ranges were indicated in Figure 18 for Pt [108], W [109], Co [110], Ga 2 O 3 [111], amorphous hydrogenated carbon [112], and polyethylene [113]. The nanoindentation hardness ranges of amorphous hydrogenated carbon were measured to vary from about 5 GPa (40 at.% H) to 21 GPa (30 at.% H) [112], while the polyethylene populates the low range from 0.022 GPa to 0.073 GPa, depending on density and molecular weight [113].…”
Section: Hardnessmentioning
confidence: 99%