2010
DOI: 10.1111/j.1600-048x.2009.04835.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Variation in the mechanical properties of flight feathers of the blackcapSylvia atricapillain relation to migration

Abstract: Migration causes temporal and energetic constraints during plumage development, which can compromise feather structure and function. In turn, given the importance of a good quality of flight feathers in migratory movements, selection may have favoured the synthesis of feathers with better mechanical properties than expected from a feather production constrained by migration necessities. However, no study has assessed whether migratory behaviour affects the relationship between the mechanical properties of feat… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

2
40
0

Year Published

2010
2010
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 33 publications
(42 citation statements)
references
References 19 publications
2
40
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Complementarily to this interpretation, several studies suggest that other factors could also contribute to explain variation in moult performance between summer and winter moult (such as energetic efficiency, Klaassen 1995; environmental conditions, Salewski et al 2004; or immune response, Moreno 2004). However, whatever the relative contribution of these factors to the variation observed in this study, the fact that feather mass is directly associated with the mechanical properties and resistance to wear of feathers (Dawson et al 2000, de la Hera et al 2010b), supports that timing of moult determines feather quality. Such variation in the quality of feathers had not been considered before and could contribute to explain the evolution of winter moult in the life history of birds.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 52%
“…Complementarily to this interpretation, several studies suggest that other factors could also contribute to explain variation in moult performance between summer and winter moult (such as energetic efficiency, Klaassen 1995; environmental conditions, Salewski et al 2004; or immune response, Moreno 2004). However, whatever the relative contribution of these factors to the variation observed in this study, the fact that feather mass is directly associated with the mechanical properties and resistance to wear of feathers (Dawson et al 2000, de la Hera et al 2010b), supports that timing of moult determines feather quality. Such variation in the quality of feathers had not been considered before and could contribute to explain the evolution of winter moult in the life history of birds.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 52%
“…However, it is important to note that the observed correlation between feather mass, rachis width and stiffness/resistance of a feather does not appear to apply to all bird populations. For example, in a migratory population of blackcaps ( Sylvia atricapilla ), where selection is expected to promote feather stiffness, individuals had feathers with thinner raques but a greater resistance to bending than sedentary populations [71]. An improved understanding of the relationship between feather characteristics, their physical properties and aerodynamical performance will require further laboratory and field studies on a diverse array of species.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The production of high‐quality feathers is an important energy‐ and nutrition‐dependent life‐history trait of a bird (Murphy et al 1988, Pap et al 2008, De la Hera et al 2010) because the losses of functionality of poor‐quality feathers may lead to a fitness reduction by diminishing future performance (Svensson and Nilsson 1997, Barta et al 2006). Also, the production of an immune response to fight against pathogens is physiologically costly (Klasing 2004, Hasselquist and Nilsson 2012).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Most studies analyzing variation in feather moult with age only tested differences between juveniles and adults (De la Hera et al 2010, Gienapp and Merilä 2010, Vágási et al 2011). Here we analyzed the variation in feather growth rate and the quality of the produced feather among house martins at four different ages (1–4 yr old).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%