Variation in soil microbial population and enzyme activities under faba bean as affected by pentachlorophenol

Siczek, Anna; Frąc, Magdalena; Gryta, Agata; Kalembasa, S.; Kalembasa, D.

doi:10.1016/j.apsoil.2019.103466

Cited by 24 publications

(25 citation statements)

References 44 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…The application to the soil of BPA, BPF and BPS induced corresponding changes in the soil microbiome, significantly enriched by TM7 in objects with BPF. This was also correlated with the findings described by Siczek et al [101]. In objects contaminated with a phenolic compound, the authors observed a high abundance of Actinobacteria and Proteobacteria, with reduced phylum Chloroflexi.…”

Section: Counts and Diversity Of Bacteriasupporting

confidence: 91%

“…Its capability for biodegradation has been confirmed in scientific research many times [101,105]. Hassen et al [102] and Siczek et al [101] found bacteria of the genus Bacillus, which were also identified in soil contaminated with bisphenols in this study, to be active in decomposing phenolic compounds. According to Li et al [94], Bacillus bacteria are capable of degrading up to 85% of BPA within 24 h. Similarly, Li et al [106] found the strain Bacillus sp.…”

Section: Counts and Diversity Of Bacteriasupporting

confidence: 71%

“…MV1 was one of the first discovered strains using BPA as a source of carbon and energy, which it obtained in the process of hydroxylation of the phenolic ring and meta-cleavage [104]. Its capability for biodegradation has been confirmed in scientific research many times [101,105]. Hassen et al [102] and Siczek et al [101] found bacteria of the genus Bacillus, which were also identified in soil contaminated with bisphenols in this study, to be active in decomposing phenolic compounds.…”

Section: Counts and Diversity Of Bacteriasupporting

confidence: 58%

“…These findings are consistent with those of other researchers. Siczek et al [101] identified all of these types in soil contaminated with a phenolic compound, except Spinghomonas. Tian et al [103] proposed two phenol degrading strains: Sphingomonas sp.…”

Section: Counts and Diversity Of Bacteriamentioning

confidence: 99%

See 3 more Smart Citations

Soil Microbiome Response to Contamination with Bisphenol A, Bisphenol F and Bisphenol S

Zaborowska

Wyszkowska

Borowik

2020

IJMS

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

The choice of the study objective was affected by numerous controversies and concerns around bisphenol F (BPF) and bisphenol S (BPS)—analogues of bisphenol A (BPA). The study focused on the determination and comparison of the scale of the BPA, BPF, and BPS impact on the soil microbiome and its enzymatic activity. The following parameters were determined in soil uncontaminated and contaminated with BPA, BPF, and BPS: the count of eleven groups of microorganisms, colony development (CD) index, microorganism ecophysiological diversity (EP) index, genetic diversity of bacteria and activity of dehydrogenases (Deh), urease (Ure), catalase (Cat), acid phosphatase (Pac), alkaline phosphatase (Pal), arylsulphatase (Aryl) and β-glucosidase (Glu). Bisphenols A, S and F significantly disrupted the soil homeostasis. BPF is regarded as the most toxic, followed by BPS and BPA. BPF and BPS reduced the abundance of Proteobacteria and Acidobacteria and increased that of Actinobacteria. Unique types of bacteria were identified as well as the characteristics of each bisphenol: Lysobacter, Steroidobacter, Variovorax, Mycoplana, for BPA, Caldilinea, Arthrobacter, Cellulosimicrobium and Promicromonospora for BPF and Dactylosporangium Geodermatophilus, Sphingopyxis for BPS. Considering the strength of a negative impact of bisphenols on the soil biochemical activity, they can be arranged as follows: BPS > BPF > BPA. Urease and arylsulphatase proved to be the most susceptible and dehydrogenases the least susceptible to bisphenols pressure, regardless of the study duration.

show abstract

Section: Counts and Diversity Of Bacteriasupporting

confidence: 91%

Section: Counts and Diversity Of Bacteriasupporting

confidence: 71%

Section: Counts and Diversity Of Bacteriasupporting

confidence: 58%

Section: Counts and Diversity Of Bacteriamentioning

confidence: 99%

See 2 more Smart Citations

Soil Microbiome Response to Contamination with Bisphenol A, Bisphenol F and Bisphenol S

Zaborowska

Wyszkowska

Borowik

2020

IJMS

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…The presented results of the metabolic profile of bacterial and growth intensity of fungal soil communities indicated differences in the functional diversity of soil microorganisms both between soil types and individual treatments. It is commonly known that, similarly to soil enzymatic activity, substrate use and the metabolic potential of soil microbes are an indicator of the intensity of biochemical processes occurring in the soil [65,66]. The highest level of metabolic diversity indices (AWCD, AWDD, H) were observed for the AL soil type which corresponds to increased enzymatic activities in the aforementioned soil type as compared to the BA soil type.…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

The Status of Soil Microbiome as Affected by the Application of Phosphorus Biofertilizer: Fertilizer Enriched with Beneficial Bacterial Strains

Mącik

Gryta

Sas-Paszt

et al. 2020

IJMS

Self Cite

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Regarding the unfavourable changes in agroecosystems resulting from the excessive application of mineral fertilizers, biopreparations containing live microorganisms are gaining increasing attention. We assumed that the application of phosphorus mineral fertilizer enriched with strains of beneficial microorganisms contribute to favourable changes in enzymatic activity and in the genetic and functional diversity of microbial populations inhabiting degraded soils. Therefore, in field experiments conditions, the effects of phosphorus fertilizer enriched with bacterial strains on the status of soil microbiome in two chemically degraded soil types (Brunic Arenosol – BA and Abruptic Luvisol – AL) were investigated. The field experiments included treatments with an optimal dose of phosphorus fertilizer (without microorganisms – FC), optimal dose of phosphorus fertilizer enriched with microorganisms including Paenibacillus polymyxa strain CHT114AB, Bacillus amyloliquefaciens strain AF75BB and Bacillus sp. strain CZP4/4 (FA100) and a dose of phosphorus fertilizer reduced by 40% and enriched with the above-mentioned bacteria (FA60). The analyzes performed included: the determination of the activity of the soil enzymes (protease, urease, acid phosphomonoesterase, β-glucosidase), the assessment of the functional diversity of microorganisms with the application of BIOLOGTM plates and the characterization of the genetic diversity of bacteria, archaea and fungi with multiplex terminal restriction fragment length polymorphism and next generation sequencing. The obtained results indicated that the application of phosphorus fertilizer enriched with microorganisms improved enzymatic activity, and the genetic and functional diversity of the soil microbial communities, however these effects were dependent on the soil type.

show abstract

Temporal changes in macro- and trace element concentrations in the rhizosphere soil of two plant species

et al. 2020

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Variation in soil microbial population and enzyme activities under faba bean as affected by pentachlorophenol

Cited by 24 publications

References 44 publications

Soil Microbiome Response to Contamination with Bisphenol A, Bisphenol F and Bisphenol S

Soil Microbiome Response to Contamination with Bisphenol A, Bisphenol F and Bisphenol S

The Status of Soil Microbiome as Affected by the Application of Phosphorus Biofertilizer: Fertilizer Enriched with Beneficial Bacterial Strains

Temporal changes in macro- and trace element concentrations in the rhizosphere soil of two plant species

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About