2014
DOI: 10.3906/tar-1303-82
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Variation in soil C and microbial functions across tree canopy projection and open grassland microenvironments

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

1
10
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 24 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 46 publications
(46 reference statements)
1
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Thus these results indicate that sample origin in iCLF is not able to discriminate from other land use types in terms of SOM, and also that the introduction of exotic tree species in the pasture has still not been able to generate contrasts in SOM within the iCLF. It corroborates results from Lai et al (2014) who found little organic carbon variation in response to introduction of tree species into pastures. In contrast to organic matter, our results showed that the land use types were separated in all of the PERMANOVA contexts (all samples, canopy, outside) by moisture content, bulk density, and exchangeable base cations (Ca 2þ þ, Mg 2þ , K þ ), which suggests that the main difference of land use are associated with changes in these soil variables (Drenovsky et al, 2004;Berthrong et al, 2009).…”
Section: Sample Origin Within the Iclf System Affects Microbial-basedsupporting
confidence: 89%
“…Thus these results indicate that sample origin in iCLF is not able to discriminate from other land use types in terms of SOM, and also that the introduction of exotic tree species in the pasture has still not been able to generate contrasts in SOM within the iCLF. It corroborates results from Lai et al (2014) who found little organic carbon variation in response to introduction of tree species into pastures. In contrast to organic matter, our results showed that the land use types were separated in all of the PERMANOVA contexts (all samples, canopy, outside) by moisture content, bulk density, and exchangeable base cations (Ca 2þ þ, Mg 2þ , K þ ), which suggests that the main difference of land use are associated with changes in these soil variables (Drenovsky et al, 2004;Berthrong et al, 2009).…”
Section: Sample Origin Within the Iclf System Affects Microbial-basedsupporting
confidence: 89%
“…The abundances of Acidobacteria, Betaproteobacteria, Deltaproteobacteria, Firmicutes, Gemmatimonadetes, Chloroflexi, Planctomycetes, Bacteroidetes and Verrucomicrobia differed significantly at this site and these taxa have been shown to respond to a range of environmental conditions and/or land use practices (Buckley et al, 2006;Wessen et al, 2010;Griffiths et al, 2011;Bagella et al, 2014;Lai et al, 2014). Although Crenarchaea are known to respond to various soil parameters, the difference in soil C:N ratio was thought to explain their increased abundance in grassland soil compared to woodland soil as crenarchaeal abundances are negatively correlated with soil C:N ratio (Barns et al, 1999;Kemnitz et al, 2007;Lehtovirta et al, 2009;Tripathi et al, 2013).…”
Section: Bacteriamentioning
confidence: 98%
“…Under Mediterranean climatic conditions, it is possible to observe wide SR temporal variations due to the dynamics of both soil temperature (Soil T) and soil water content (SWC) (Rey et al., ). Consistently, from winter to early spring, soil T was observed to act as the main driver of SR, while during summer SWC mostly controls this process (Almagro, López, Querejeta, & Martínez‐Mena, ; de Dato, De Angelis, Sirca, & Beier, ; Lai, Lagomarsino, Ledda, & Roggero, ; Oyonarte, Rey, Raimundo, Miralles, & Escribano, ). Although in humid periods SR variability can be explained by an exponential relationship between Soil T and SR (Davidson, Belk, & Boone, ), under drought conditions SWC turns into the most important factor affecting SR dynamics (Almagro et al., ; Correia et al., ; Oyonarte et al., ).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 95%