Abstract:There are substantial variations in coverage and quantity limits and a high degree of complexity in triptan coverage for both government and commercial plans.
“…The coverage of generic and brand name triptans by both commercial and noncommercial insurers was very heterogeneous, although generic sumatriptan, naratriptan, zolmitriptan, and rizatriptan were covered by nearly all plans. The study demonstrated that equitable access was problematic, particularly for specific triptans and formulations, quantity limits, and requirements for step therapy that may be major barriers to care impacting patients specifically with government (noncommercial) insurance plans . The efficacy and cost effectiveness of treatment for, as well as health care utilization by, individuals with a low socioeconomic/educational status and migraine should be further explored.…”
There are many barriers and challenges that affect people with migraine who are underinsured or uninsured, particularly those of under-represented racial backgrounds and of lower socioeconomic status.
“…The coverage of generic and brand name triptans by both commercial and noncommercial insurers was very heterogeneous, although generic sumatriptan, naratriptan, zolmitriptan, and rizatriptan were covered by nearly all plans. The study demonstrated that equitable access was problematic, particularly for specific triptans and formulations, quantity limits, and requirements for step therapy that may be major barriers to care impacting patients specifically with government (noncommercial) insurance plans . The efficacy and cost effectiveness of treatment for, as well as health care utilization by, individuals with a low socioeconomic/educational status and migraine should be further explored.…”
There are many barriers and challenges that affect people with migraine who are underinsured or uninsured, particularly those of under-represented racial backgrounds and of lower socioeconomic status.
“…Unfortunately, some may cost in excess of $12 per dose and are strictly limited in monthly quantity on many Medicaid plans. 10 Oral NSAIDs and combination analgesics with caffeine are considered reasonable first-line treatment choices for mild to moderate migraine attacks or severe attacks that have previously responded to NSAIDs. Many generic NSAIDs are covered on Medicaid plans.…”
We identified and discussed migraine treatment barriers that affect underserved populations in the US and summarized practical, cost-effective strategies to surmount them. However, more research is needed to identify the best cost-effective measures for migraine management in underserved and vulnerable patients who are uninsured or underinsured.
“…Our findings suggest that patients' migraine medication regimens should be regularly assessed for appropriate medication use and to ensure that their medications are still effective.Another common circumstance for a migraine-related ED visit was not having prescribed abortive medication on hand at the migraine onset; almost one in six total ED visits may have been preventable had patients had their medications available. Prescription insurance payers often set monthly quantity limits for triptans due to risk for medication overuse headache, and may impact lack of triptan availability 25. However, if patients run out of triptans due to frequent use, new or additional migraine preventive therapy or a dose adjustment of their current therapy would be warranted 8.…”
Objective: This study compared migraine medication prescribing between patients with a migraine diagnosis who used versus did not use the emergency department (ED) for migraine. Background: Headache is the fifth most common chief complaint for ED visits nationwide and the third most common potentially avoidable ED diagnosis in the University of Colorado Health system. The reasons some patients use the ED for migraine management while others do not and whether some ED admissions might be preventable remain unclear. Methods: This retrospective cohort study identified adults with migraine-related diagnoses within 1 year before the index date of July 1, 2018 and compared patient characteristics and migraine medication prescribing patterns between those who did or did not have a subsequent migraine-related ED encounter the following year. ED admission notes were manually reviewed to identify potentially preventable circumstances that led to the ED visit. The primary outcome was the proportion of patients with an active triptan prescription at the index date. Results: Of the 3843 patients identified, 35 patients (0.9%) had a migraine-related ED encounter. Of these, 17/35 (49%) had an active triptan prescription compared to 1360/3808 (36%) of non-ED utilizers (p = 0.114), OR 1.22 (95% CI 0.61-2.45). More ED utilizers had an active prescription for opioids (11/35 [31%] vs. 663/3808 [17%], p = 0.030) and migraine preventive therapy (19/35 [54%] vs. 1149/3808 [30%], p = 0.002), and neurology referrals (20/35 [57%] vs. 654/3808 [17%], p < 0.001) compared to non-ED utilizers. The most common circumstance for migraine-related ED visits was nonresponse to migraine abortive medications administered at home. Conclusions: Triptan prescribing did not differ between ED utilizers and non-ED utilizers for migraine. Overall, less than half of the total patient population had a triptan prescribed. More ED utilizers had neurology referrals, prescriptions for opioids and preventive therapies, and a history of previous ED visit for any reason, which may be markers for higher disease severity or behavior patterns. Future research and interventions to reduce migraine-related ED use could target high-risk patients such as those with previous ED visits for any indication and neurology referrals.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.