1979
DOI: 10.1118/1.594545
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Variation in output factor caused by secondary blocking for 7–16 MeV electron beams

Abstract: The effect of secondary blocking on the output for 7-16 MeV electron beams is investigated for the two most widely used methods of field shaping, i.e.,(a) shield on surface, and (b) shield at end of cone with subsequent air gap. For those two methods differences in output on the order of 10% are observed. These effects are explained in terms of the blocking geometry and its influence on scattered radiation.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

1980
1980
2009
2009

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Energy deposition by electron beams in a medium is significantly affected by the beam characteristics and collimation and by the medium geometry and construction due to multiple Coulomb scattering (Bethe et al 1938, Berger 1963, Lanzl 1981. Consequently, output factors for electron beams vary in a complicated manner with beam energy and field geometry (Biggs et al 1979, Choi et al 1979, Hogstrom et al 1981, Nair et al 1983, Meyer et al 1984, Mills et al 1985, AAPM 1991, Al-Ghazi and Tavares 1993, Shiu et al 1994. In particular, the prediction of output factors for small-field electron beams is complicated by the lack of lateral scatter equilibrium (McGinley et al 1979, AAPM 1983, 1991, Sharma et al 1984, ICRU 1984a, Niroomand-Rad 1989, Rashid et al 1990.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Energy deposition by electron beams in a medium is significantly affected by the beam characteristics and collimation and by the medium geometry and construction due to multiple Coulomb scattering (Bethe et al 1938, Berger 1963, Lanzl 1981. Consequently, output factors for electron beams vary in a complicated manner with beam energy and field geometry (Biggs et al 1979, Choi et al 1979, Hogstrom et al 1981, Nair et al 1983, Meyer et al 1984, Mills et al 1985, AAPM 1991, Al-Ghazi and Tavares 1993, Shiu et al 1994. In particular, the prediction of output factors for small-field electron beams is complicated by the lack of lateral scatter equilibrium (McGinley et al 1979, AAPM 1983, 1991, Sharma et al 1984, ICRU 1984a, Niroomand-Rad 1989, Rashid et al 1990.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The dose delivered by electron beams has complex dependence on the shape of the field, design of collimator systems, and energy of the beam. [1][2][3][4][5] This complicated dependence arises because the electrons undergo multiple scatter in the accelerator head, in the collimator systems, in the intervening air between the collimator and the patient, off the walls of the applicator, off the field shaping cerrobend inserts ͑cutouts͒, and finally in the patient. The dosimetry for regular circular, square, or rectangular fields is straightforward.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%