2021
DOI: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2021.20951
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Variation in Management of Extremity Soft-Tissue Sarcoma in Younger vs Older Adults

Abstract: IMPORTANCE A large proportion of extremity soft-tissue sarcomas (ESS) occur among young adults, yet this group is underrepresented in clinical trials, resulting in limited data on this population. Younger patients present many complex challenges that affect clinical management. OBJECTIVE To investigate variations in treatment management in young adults vs older adults with ESS. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS This multicenter retrospective cohort study used the National Cancer Data Base (NCDB) to identify pa… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 20 publications
(36 reference statements)
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…167 Another factor seen in clinical treatment patterns includes variation in the management of extremity STS, where a study described age as being a factor of treatment, with young adults more likely to receive chemotherapy and less likely to receive RT when compared to older groups. 168 In a retrospective database review, the impact of age showed an overall lower local recurrence rate in primary amputations of elderly patients (over 90 years) when compared to limb salvage. 169 Patient-reported outcomes are another important aspect of clinical considerations, as they often guide a multidisciplinary approach to improving physical function 170 and quality of life through functional rehabilitation.…”
Section: Clinical Treatment Patterns and Outcomesmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…167 Another factor seen in clinical treatment patterns includes variation in the management of extremity STS, where a study described age as being a factor of treatment, with young adults more likely to receive chemotherapy and less likely to receive RT when compared to older groups. 168 In a retrospective database review, the impact of age showed an overall lower local recurrence rate in primary amputations of elderly patients (over 90 years) when compared to limb salvage. 169 Patient-reported outcomes are another important aspect of clinical considerations, as they often guide a multidisciplinary approach to improving physical function 170 and quality of life through functional rehabilitation.…”
Section: Clinical Treatment Patterns and Outcomesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Conversely, a review of the NCDB identified 41,529 patients with STS and found that increased timing to treatment was associated with socioeconomic factors and issues within hospital systems 167 . Another factor seen in clinical treatment patterns includes variation in the management of extremity STS, where a study described age as being a factor of treatment, with young adults more likely to receive chemotherapy and less likely to receive RT when compared to older groups 168 . In a retrospective database review, the impact of age showed an overall lower local recurrence rate in primary amputations of elderly patients (over 90 years) when compared to limb salvage 169 .…”
Section: Disparities Of Care In Stsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Table II shows a number of recent studies on soft-tissue tumors [46][47][48][49][50][51][52][53][54][55][56][57][58][59][60][61][62][63][64][65] .…”
Section: Soft-tissue Tumorsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There is ongoing interest in identifying patient, tumor, and perioperative factors that impact both surgical and oncologic outcomes in patients with soft-tissue tumors [46][47][48][49]57,61,65 . Analyses of the impact of patient age on surgical management and oncologic outcomes have demonstrated similar rates of limbsalvage surgery with significant differences in the choice of systemic therapies 65 .…”
Section: Predictive Modelingmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation